PURPOSE: A well-structured system of appointments is mandatory in urological practices to provide a perfect work flow. A huge problem is appointments which are not cancelled by non-attending patients and remain free during consultation hours. METHODS: An analysis of the electronic calendar of our group practice was performed from January 2010 to December 2010. RESULTS: In 2010, 24,764 appointments in consultation hours were scheduled and of those 1,348 (5.4%) were not cancelled but not attended by the patients. Out of 1,760 X-ray investigations 59 (3.3%) patients did not show up and of 3,828 cystoscopy appointments, 109 (2.8%) patients did not cancel although they did not attend. A total of 440 outpatient appointments for surgery were scheduled and 8 (1.8%) patients did not attend but did not cancel surgery. Out of 176 (11.4%) scheduled spermiogram appointments, 20 patients did not bring a sample for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the experiences of the authors, combined investigations, e.g. intravenous pyelogram (IVP) and cystoscopy on one day, should therefore be avoided in order to be able to cancel the second appointment when patients do not show up for the first appointment. In cases of surgical interventions, patients should be contacted by telephone 2-3 days prior to surgery for confirmation. Currently under German law there is no way to claim compensation for missed appointments from the patients. Thus, the only way to avoid large numbers of missed appointments is to keep those as low as possible, as soon as appointments are made and scheduled (e.g. no double appointments).
PURPOSE: A well-structured system of appointments is mandatory in urological practices to provide a perfect work flow. A huge problem is appointments which are not cancelled by non-attending patients and remain free during consultation hours. METHODS: An analysis of the electronic calendar of our group practice was performed from January 2010 to December 2010. RESULTS: In 2010, 24,764 appointments in consultation hours were scheduled and of those 1,348 (5.4%) were not cancelled but not attended by the patients. Out of 1,760 X-ray investigations 59 (3.3%) patients did not show up and of 3,828 cystoscopy appointments, 109 (2.8%) patients did not cancel although they did not attend. A total of 440 outpatient appointments for surgery were scheduled and 8 (1.8%) patients did not attend but did not cancel surgery. Out of 176 (11.4%) scheduled spermiogram appointments, 20 patients did not bring a sample for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the experiences of the authors, combined investigations, e.g. intravenous pyelogram (IVP) and cystoscopy on one day, should therefore be avoided in order to be able to cancel the second appointment when patients do not show up for the first appointment. In cases of surgical interventions, patients should be contacted by telephone 2-3 days prior to surgery for confirmation. Currently under German law there is no way to claim compensation for missed appointments from the patients. Thus, the only way to avoid large numbers of missed appointments is to keep those as low as possible, as soon as appointments are made and scheduled (e.g. no double appointments).