Literature DB >> 22733398

[Change of the LHRH analogue in progressive castration-refractory prostate cancer].

A Heidenreich1, D Porres, R Epplen, T van Erps, D Pfister.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medicinal or surgical castration remains the treatment of choice in metastatic, hormone-naive prostate cancer; however, 2-12% of patients never reach the target serum levels for medicinal castration. We analyzed the therapeutic efficacy of triptorelin pamoate (TP) as salvage treatment due to its higher potency than endogenous luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH). The amino acid sequence of TP is identical to that of endogenous LHRH except for position 6 where L-glycine is replaced by D-tryptophane rendering the synthetic moiety less susceptible to cleavage by proteolytic enzymes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study 36 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression following first line complete androgen blockade and antiandrogen (ADT) withdrawal were retrospectively analyzed. All patients demonstrated no or minimal metastatic disease. The PSA levels, PSA doubling time (PSADT), PSA velocity (PSAV) and testosterone serum concentrations were correlated with the therapeutic response. All patients received TP at a dose of 11.5 mg at 3-month intervals until documented progression.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 69.2 years (range 52-79 years), the mean PSA level was 23.4 ng/ml (8.7-53.1 ng/ml) and the mean PSADT was 9.2 months (2.9-15.4 months). Mean testosterone serum concentration was 38.67 ng/dl (21-76 ng/dl), the mean time between start of ADT and progression was 42.4 months (13-76 months) and the median time was 46.8 months (16-82 months). A PSA decrease of ≥50% was reached in 9 out of 36 (25%) patients, 3 out of 36 (13.9%) patients each demonstrated stable PSA levels and a prolongation of PSADT from 6.2 to 9.8 months. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.4 weeks (7-53 weeks). PSA-responders exhibited a PFS of 53.2 weeks (26-64 weeks) as compared to 28 weeks (17-35 weeks) in nonresponders. PSA responders demonstrated significantly higher testosterone serum concentrations of 48.3 ng/dl (29-76 ng/dl) as compared to nonresponders with 32.6 ng/dl (21-62 ng/dl, p=0.02). Mean follow-up was 31.4 months (27-39 months), overall survival was 80.5% and cancer-specific survival was 88.9%.
CONCLUSION: Changing the LHRH analogue in castration-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) with testosterone serum concentrations at or above the castration level results in a temporary PSA response. This treatment option might be included in the therapeutic algorithm of CRPC. Although the PFS is short it allows the continuation of a treatment option with minimal side effects in a mere palliative situation. The data underline the need for continuous monitoring of testosterone during treatment with LHRH analogues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733398     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-2948-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  26 in total

Review 1.  Combination of somatostatin analogues and dexamethasone (anti-survival-factor concept) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in androgen ablation-refractory prostate cancer with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Michael Koutsilieris; Theodore Dimopoulos; Constantine Milathianakis; John Bogdanos; Dimitrios Karamanolakis; Nicholas Pissimissis; Antonis Halapas; Peter Lembessis; Andreas Papaioannou; Antigone Sourla
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Efficacy and safety of androgen deprivation therapy after switching from monthly leuprolide to monthly degarelix in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J de la Rosette; R Davis; D Frankel; T Kold Olesen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Investigative clinical study on prostate cancer part VI: Follicle-stimulating hormone and the pituitary-testicular-prostate axis at the time of initial diagnosis and subsequent cluster selection of the patient population.

Authors:  Antonio B Porcaro; Filippo Migliorini; Aldo Petrozziello; Teodoro Sava; Mario Romano; Beatrice Caruso; Claudio Cocco; Claudio Ghimenton; Stefano Zecchinini Antoniolli; Vincenzo Lacola; Emanuele Rubilotta; Carmelo Monaco; Luigi Comunale
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Failure to achieve castrate levels of testosterone during luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist therapy: the case for monitoring serum testosterone and a treatment decision algorithm.

Authors:  M G Oefelein; R Cornum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo Van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filiberto Zattoni; Axel Heidenreich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  A phase III extension trial with a 1-arm crossover from leuprolide to degarelix: comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist effect on prostate cancer.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Bertrand Tombal; Kurt Miller; Laurent Boccon-Gibod; Fritz Schröder; Neal Shore; Judd W Moul; Jens-Kristian Jensen; Tine Kold Olesen; Bo-Eric Persson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Diethylstilbestrol (DES) retains activity and is a reasonable option in patients previously treated with docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Serrate; Y Loriot; T De La Motte Rouge; M Gross-Goupil; C Massard; B Escudier; A Bossi; K Fizazi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Effective testosterone suppression for prostate cancer: is there a best castration therapy?

Authors:  Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

10.  Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Susan Halabi; Ian Tannock; Michael Morris; Cora N Sternberg; Michael A Carducci; Mario A Eisenberger; Celestia Higano; Glenn J Bubley; Robert Dreicer; Daniel Petrylak; Philip Kantoff; Ethan Basch; William Kevin Kelly; William D Figg; Eric J Small; Tomasz M Beer; George Wilding; Alison Martin; Maha Hussain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Maximal testosterone suppression in prostate cancer--free vs total testosterone.

Authors:  Kyle O Rove; E David Crawford; Massimo Perachino; Juan Morote; Laurence Klotz; Paul H Lange; Gerald L Andriole; Alvin M Matsumoto; Samir S Taneja; Mario A Eisenberger; Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Androgen-targeted therapy in men with prostate cancer: evolving practice and future considerations.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Axel Heidenreich; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Bertrand Tombal; Antonio C L Pompeo; Arturo Mendoza-Valdes; Kurt Miller; Frans M J Debruyne; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.554

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.