Literature DB >> 22732613

Costs and benefits of jasmonic acid induced responses in soybean.

A K Accamando1, J T Cronin.   

Abstract

In response to herbivory, plants have evolved defense strategies to reduce herbivore preference and performance. A strategy whereby defenses are induced only upon herbivory can mitigate costs of defense when herbivores are scarce. Although costs and benefits of induced responses are generally assumed, empirical evidence for many species is lacking. Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) has emerged as a model species with which to address questions about induced responses. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the fitness costs and benefits of jasmonic acid-induced responses by soybean in the absence and presence of soybean loopers (Chrysodeix includens Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In a greenhouse experiment we demonstrated that soybean induction was costly. Induced plants produced 10.1% fewer seeds that were 9.0% lighter, and had 19.2% lower germination rates than noninduced plants. However, induction provided only modest benefits to soybeans. In a choice experiment, soybean loopers significantly preferred leaves from noninduced plants, consuming 62% more tissue than from induced plants. Soybean loopers that fed on plants that were previously subjected to treatment with jasmonic acid matured at the same rate and to the same size as those that fed on control plants. However, at high conspecific density, soybean looper survivorship was reduced by 44% on previously induced relative to control plants. Reduced soybean looper preference and survivorship did not translate into fitness benefits for soybeans. Our findings support theoretical predictions of costly induced defenses and highlight the importance of considering the environmental context in studies of plant defense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732613     DOI: 10.1603/EN11277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Entomol        ISSN: 0046-225X            Impact factor:   2.377


  6 in total

1.  Plant-mediated effects on an insect-pathogen interaction vary with intraspecific genetic variation in plant defences.

Authors:  Ikkei Shikano; Ketia L Shumaker; Michelle Peiffer; Gary W Felton; Kelli Hoover
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Tomato Reproductive Success Is Equally Affected by Herbivores That Induce or That Suppress Defenses.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Saioa Legarrea; Merijn R Kant
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  How to induce defense responses in wild plant populations? Using bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) as example.

Authors:  Tarald Seldal; Stein Joar Hegland; Knut Rydgren; Cesar Rodriguez-Saona; Joachim Paul Töpper
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Elicitor-Based Biostimulant PSP1 Protects Soybean Against Late Season Diseases in Field Trials.

Authors:  Nadia R Chalfoun; Sandra B Durman; Jorge González-Montaner; Sebastián Reznikov; Vicente De Lisi; Victoria González; Enrique R Moretti; Mario R Devani; L Daniel Ploper; Atilio P Castagnaro; Björn Welin
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Plant Growth Regulators Improve Grain Production and Water Use Efficiency of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. under Water Stress.

Authors:  Ghasem Parmoon; Ali Ebadi; Masoud Hashemi; Barbara Hawrylak-Nowak; Carol Baskin; Soodabe Jahanbakhsh
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Quantitative Proteomic and Transcriptomic Study on Autotetraploid Paulownia and Its Diploid Parent Reveal Key Metabolic Processes Associated with Paulownia Autotetraploidization.

Authors:  Yanpeng Dong; Minjie Deng; Zhenli Zhao; Guoqiang Fan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.