Literature DB >> 22732423

The current status of procedural sedation for pediatric patients in out-of-operating room locations.

Jeana E Havidich1, Joseph P Cravero.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To illustrate the changes that are occurring in the rapidly growing field of pediatric sedation. In the USA and throughout the world, children receive sedation from a multitude of specialists with varying levels of training. The current pediatric sedation literature reflects a growing body of sedation literature by medical specialists other than anesthesiologists. This article will review the controversial use of propofol by nonanesthesiologists and the manner in which this varied group of providers along with government entities, regulatory agencies, and national organizations contribute to the continuing evolution of sedation practices. RECENT
FINDINGS: The number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed on children outside of the operating room continues to increase. The growing body of pediatric sedation literature suggests anesthesiologists are no longer at the forefront of pediatric sedation training, education, and research. Articles published by nonanesthesiologists describe pediatric sedation services, safety, and quality initiatives, drugs, and original sedation research. Medications that were considered under the realm of anesthesiologists are utilized by nonanesthesiologists to provide sedation to children. Regulating and government agencies, including the Joint Commission and the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services have recently issued statements on the oversight and practice of sedation.
SUMMARY: The direction of pediatric sedation is no longer solely under the leadership of anesthesiologists. The use of anesthetic agents, including propofol, have been administered by nonanesthesiologists and reported as safe and effective agents. Nonanesthesiologists and governmental and regulatory agencies influence the delivery of sedation services. The future direction of pediatric sedation will ultimately depend upon the ability of anesthesiologists to collaborate with specialists, hospital administrators, credentialing committees, and oversight agencies in order to provide high-quality efficient sedation services to children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22732423     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835562d8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  15 in total

1.  Review on sedation for gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in children by non-anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Rok Orel; Jernej Brecelj; Jorge Amil Dias; Claudio Romano; Fernanda Barros; Mike Thomson; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25

2.  Provision of deep procedural sedation by a pediatric sedation team at a freestanding imaging center.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Emrath; Jana A Stockwell; Courtney E McCracken; Harold K Simon; Pradip P Kamat
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-24

3.  Pediatric Sedation: Using Secondary Data to Describe Registered Nurse Practice in Radiology.

Authors:  Nancy Crego
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2014-12

4.  Outcomes following implementation of a pediatric procedural sedation guide for referral to general anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Grunwell; Neelima K Marupudi; Rohan V Gupta; Curtis D Travers; Courtney E McCracken; Julie L Williamson; Jana A Stockwell; James D Fortenberry; Kevin Couloures; Joseph Cravero; Pradip P Kamat
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.556

5.  Adjuvant lidocaine to a propofol-ketamine-based sedation regimen for bone marrow aspirates and biopsy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Yu; Ryan Louer; Riad Lutfi; Samer Abu-Sultaneh; Mouhammad Yabrodi; Janine Zee-Cheng; Kamal Abulebda
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Incidence and predictors of respiratory adverse events in children undergoing procedural sedation with intramuscular ketamine in a paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Jia Le Lee; Lai Peng Tham
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  The design of a multicentre Canadian surveillance study of sedation safety in the paediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Maala Bhatt; Mark G Roback; Gary Joubert; Ken J Farion; Samina Ali; Suzanne Beno; C Michelle McTimoney; Andrew Dixon; Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky; Nick Barrowman; David W Johnson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  What Works and What's Safe in Pediatric Emergency Procedural Sedation: An Overview of Reviews.

Authors:  Lisa Hartling; Andrea Milne; Michelle Foisy; Eddy S Lang; Douglas Sinclair; Terry P Klassen; Lisa Evered
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Perceptions of parents and paediatricians on pain induced by bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture among children with acute leukaemia: a qualitative study in China.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qiang Liu; Jia-Ning Yu; Hai-Xia Wang; Lu-Lu Gao; Ya-Liang Dai; Xin Jin; Feng Zuo; Juan Liu; Cai-Feng Bai; Guo-Xia Mu; Xiao-Min Chai; Yin-Juan Zhang; Yu-Xiang Li; Jian-Qiang Yu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Higher Mallampati Scores Are Not Associated with More Adverse Events During Pediatric Procedural Sedation and Analgesia.

Authors:  Maya S Iyer; Raymond D Pitetti; Melissa Vitale
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.