Literature DB >> 2273216

Finding audiences, changing beliefs: the structure of research use in Canadian health policy.

J Lomas1.   

Abstract

The impact of research information depends on its ability to change beliefs or policy assumptions within the relevant audiences. As a hybrid of American and British systems, Canada's chosen decision-making structure for policy-making and its legislative framework for health insurance make these audiences unclear and not readily accessible. This factor and historical characteristics of the research community which made them only partially responsive to the values of decisionmakers provide an explanation for the limited past use of research information in Canadian health policy. More recently, improved responsiveness by researchers and an emerging definition of the audiences by legislative policymakers are bringing about a gradual increase in the potential impact of research at the levels of administrative and clinical policy. Because of continuing decision-making constraints on legislative policy, however, impact at this level is predicted to remain diffuse, with only cautious acceptance of the changes in beliefs implied by research.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2273216     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-15-3-525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  11 in total

1.  Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Suzanne E Ross; Jeremiah E Hurley; Joanne M Hohenadel; Gregory L Stoddart; Christel A Woodward; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers?

Authors:  John N Lavis; Dave Robertson; Jennifer M Woodside; Christopher B McLeod; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Marc Lemire; Jean-Louis Denis; Emile Tremblay
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  More than "using research": the real challenges in promoting evidence-informed decision-making.

Authors:  Sarah Bowen; Tannis Erickson; Patricia J Martens; Susan Crockett
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-02

5.  Evaluation models and evaluation use.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Astrid Brousselle
Journal:  Evaluation (Lond)       Date:  2012-01

6.  Building a virtual network in a community health research training program.

Authors:  F Lau; R Hayward
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Beyond Academia - Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework.

Authors:  Emma Terama; Melanie Smallman; Simon J Lock; Charlotte Johnson; Martin Zaltz Austwick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Who needs what from a national health research system: lessons from reforms to the English Department of Health's R&D system.

Authors:  Stephen Hanney; Shyama Kuruvilla; Bryony Soper; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-05-13

9.  Grading and reporting health and health disparities.

Authors:  Bridget C Booske; Angela M K Rohan; David A Kindig; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment.

Authors:  Stephen R Hanney; Miguel A Gonzalez-Block; Martin J Buxton; Maurice Kogan
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2003-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.