| Literature DB >> 22732077 |
Abstract
In seasonally breeding animals, timing of reproduction in females can influence offspring development and survival. Temporal and energetic constraints are often more pronounced in juveniles born late in the season, and could activate the stress axis. Common hamsters (Cricetus cricetus) are hibernating rodents, and adult females produce up to three litters during the active season. Birth dates range from May to September, and shortly after natal emergence pups are weaned and start to disperse. In this study, we used faecal cortisol metabolites (FCM) as a non-invasive measure of recent glucocorticoid exposure. We compared FCM levels between early- (June/July) and late- (August/September) born juvenile Common hamsters during their first weeks after natal emergence. We further compared FCM levels in juveniles born in the study area and individuals that immigrated either early or late in the season. Additionally, we investigated potential effects of human disturbances on cortisol secretion patterns. FCM levels in late-born juveniles increased during the first weeks post-emergence and were significantly higher than those in early-born individuals during the post-weaning period. Late-immigrating juveniles had significantly higher FCM levels than early immigrants and residents during the same time period. Individuals that inhabited areas frequently used by humans had higher FCM levels than those in low-impact areas. These results indicate that the seasonal timing of birth and dispersal affect cortisol secretion patterns in juvenile Common hamsters. As all juveniles immerged into their hibernacula during early October, we assume that late-born and late-immigrated individuals have less time to prepare for hibernation. This could elevate energetic demands and increase exposure to predators and/or humans during food caching. These factors might lead to increased adrenal activity and thus, elevated FCM concentrations in these individuals. Potential consequences of these time constraints and associated physiological effects could be reflected in the lower overwinter survival rates of juveniles born late in the season.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22732077 PMCID: PMC3423633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.06.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gen Comp Endocrinol ISSN: 0016-6480 Impact factor: 2.822
ANOVA (Type III tests) table for effects of time of birth (early or late), post-emergence intervals (pre-weaning, weaning, or post-weaning), and sex on FCM-levels (response variable) in juvenile hamsters. For interaction details see Table 2.
| Predictor variables | df | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Time of birth | 1 | 0.11 | 0.739 |
| Post-emergence interval | 2 | 3.17 | 0.052 |
| Sex | 1 | 0.12 | 0.736 |
| Time of birth × post-emergence interval | 2 | 9.87 | <0.001 |
| Time of birth × sex | 1 | 0.93 | 0.342 |
| Post-emergence interval × sex | 2 | 2.51 | 0.093 |
Fig. 1FCM concentrations (means ± SE) in early- and late-born juvenile Common hamsters during the pre-weaning, weaning, and post-weaning period. Early-born individuals emerged from the natal burrow between 1 June and 7 July, late-born juveniles between 29 July and 20 September. Groups with the same letter do not differ significantly (for p-values see Tables 1 and 2). Sample sizes: pre-weaning, early-born = 13, late-born = 11; weaning, early-born = 13, late-born = 6; post-weaning, early-born = 5, late-born = 5.
Post-hoc comparisons (Tukey’s HSD test) of FCM-levels in early- and late-born juveniles during their first weeks post-emergence. Late-born individuals during the post-weaning interval had significantly higher levels than all other groups. Only significant group comparisons are shown (for all other comparisons, e.g. early-born juveniles during pre-weaning vs. early-born ones during weaning, p > 0.6). Numbers in parenthesis indicate sample size. Diff…differences between pairs, lwr./upr… lower/upper 95%-confidence intervals.
| Group | Diff. | Lwr. | Upr. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Late-born post-weaning (5) vs. early-born pre-weaning (13) | 535.9 | 112.1 | 959.7 | 0.006 |
| Late-born post-weaning (5) vs. early-born weaning (13) | 611.6 | 187.8 | 1035.4 | 0.001 |
| Late-born post-weaning (5) vs. early-born post-weaning (5) | 757.7 | 248.4 | 1267.1 | 0.001 |
| late-born post-weaning (5) vs. late-born pre-weaning (11) | 652.6 | 218.2 | 1086.9 | 0.001 |
| Late-born post-weaning (5) vs. late-born weaning (6) | 574.9 | 87.2 | 1062.5 | 0.013 |
ANOVA (Type III tests) table for effects of status (resident or immigrant), period (early or late in the season), sex, and area (high or low human impact) on FCM-levels (response variable) in juvenile hamsters. For details on interactions see Table 4.
| Predictor variables | df | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Status | 1 | 6.6 | 0.012 |
| Period | 1 | 17.51 | <0.001 |
| Sex | 1 | 7.23 | 0.009 |
| Area | 1 | 17.18 | <0.001 |
| Status × period | 1 | 7.41 | 0.008 |
| Status × sex | 1 | 8.71 | 0.004 |
Fig. 2FCM levels (means ± SE) in resident (born in the study area) and immigrated juvenile hamsters. Individuals that immigrated early (before 26 July) and late in the season (after 17 August) are compared. Groups with the same letter do not differ significantly (for p-values see Tables 3 and 4). Sample sizes: breeding, residents = 28, immigrants = 15; post-breeding, residents = 41, immigrants = 14.
Post-hoc comparisons (Tukey’s HSD test) of (a) FCM-levels in resident and immigrated juveniles (status) early and late in the season (period). (b) Comparisons of FCM-levels between male and female residents and immigrants. Differences were significant only between male residents and immigrants, with the latter showing higher levels (for all other comparisons, e.g., female residents – female immigrants, p > 0.1). Numbers in parenthesis indicate sample size. Diff… differences between pairs, lwr./upr… lower/upper 95%-confidence intervals.
| Group | Diff. | Lwr. | Upr. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | Late immigrants (14) vs. early immigrants (15) | 285.7 | 52.3 | 519.1 | 0.01 |
| Late immigrants (14) vs. early residents (28) | 236.6 | 31.0 | 442.1 | 0.017 | |
| Late immigrants (14) vs. late residents (41) | −195.5 | −389.9 | −1.2 | 0.048 | |
| Early residents (28) vs. late residents (41) | 41.0 | −113.0 | 195.0 | 0.898 | |
| Early residents (28) vs. early immigrants (15) | 49.1 | −151.8 | 250.1 | 0.919 | |
| Late residents (41) vs. early immigrants (15) | 90.1 | −99.4 | 279.6 | 0.6 | |
| (b) | Male residents (35) vs. male immigrants (18) | −191.5 | -371.2 | -11.8 | 0.032 |