OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. DESIGN: Two keyword pairs (hearing loss and hearing aids) were entered into five country-specific versions of the most commonly used internet search engine in May 2011. SAMPLE: For each of the 10 searches, the first 10 relevant websites were included. After removing duplicates, a total of 66 websites were assessed. Their origin (commercial, non-profit organization, or government), date of last update, quality (Health On the Net (HON) certification and DISCERN scores), and readability (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Formula, and Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook) were assessed. RESULTS: Most websites were of commercial origin and had been updated within the last 18 months. Their quality and readability was highly variable. Only 14% of the websites had HON certification. Websites that were of non-profit organization origin had significantly higher DISCERN scores. Readability measures show that on average, only people with at least 11-12 years of education could read and understand the internet information presented. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, this article provides a list of recommendations for website developers and clinicians wishing to incorporate internet information into their practice.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others. DESIGN: Two keyword pairs (hearing loss and hearing aids) were entered into five country-specific versions of the most commonly used internet search engine in May 2011. SAMPLE: For each of the 10 searches, the first 10 relevant websites were included. After removing duplicates, a total of 66 websites were assessed. Their origin (commercial, non-profit organization, or government), date of last update, quality (Health On the Net (HON) certification and DISCERN scores), and readability (Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Formula, and Simple Measure Of Gobbledygook) were assessed. RESULTS: Most websites were of commercial origin and had been updated within the last 18 months. Their quality and readability was highly variable. Only 14% of the websites had HON certification. Websites that were of non-profit organization origin had significantly higher DISCERN scores. Readability measures show that on average, only people with at least 11-12 years of education could read and understand the internet information presented. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, this article provides a list of recommendations for website developers and clinicians wishing to incorporate internet information into their practice.
Authors: K Jonas Brännström; Marie Öberg; Elisabeth Ingo; Kristoffer N T Månsson; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas Lunner; Ariane Laplante-Lévesque Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2016-01-26