Literature DB >> 22729504

The medial patellofemoral ligament: location of femoral attachment and length change patterns resulting from anatomic and nonanatomic attachments.

Joanna M Stephen1, Punyawang Lumpaopong, David J Deehan, Deiary Kader, Andrew A Amis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incompetence of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is an integral factor in patellofemoral instability. Reconstruction of this structure is gaining increasing popularity. However, the natural behavior of the ligament is still not fully understood, and crucially, the correct landmark for femoral attachment of the MPFL at surgery is poorly defined.
PURPOSE: To determine the length change pattern of the native MPFL, investigate the effect of nonanatomic femoral and differing patellar attachment sites on length changes, and recommend a reproducible femoral attachment site for undertaking anatomic MPFL reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Eight cadaveric knees were dissected of skin and subcutaneous fat and mounted in a kinematics rig with the quadriceps tensioned. The MPFL length change patterns were measured for combinations of patellar and femoral attachments using a suture and displacement transducer. Three attachments were along the superomedial border of the patella, and 5 femoral attachments were at the MPFL center and 5 mm proximal, distal, anterior, and posterior to this point. Reproducibility of attachment sites was validated radiographically.
RESULTS: The femoral attachment point, taking the anterior-posterior medial femoral condyle diameter to be 100%, was identified 40% from the posterior, 50% from the distal, and 60% from the anterior border of the medial femoral condyle. This point was most isometric, with a mean maximal length change to the central patellar attachment of 2.1 mm from 0° to 110° of knee flexion. The proximal femoral attachment resulted in up to 6.4 mm mean lengthening and the distal attachment up to 9.1 mm mean shortening through 0° to 110° of knee flexion, resulting in a significantly nonisometric graft (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: We report the anatomic femoral and patellar MPFL graft attachments, with confirmation of the reproducibility of their location and resulting kinematic behavior. Nonanatomic attachments caused significant loss of isometry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The importance of an anatomically positioned MPFL reconstruction is highlighted, and an identifiable radiographic point for femoral tunnel position is suggested for use intraoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729504     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512449998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  52 in total

1.  Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Julio Domenech; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of MPFL reconstructions: differences in dynamic contact pressure between gracilis and fascia lata graft.

Authors:  Olaf Lorbach; Alexander Haupert; Turgay Efe; Antonius Pizanis; Imke Weyers; Dieter Kohn; Matthias Kieb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluation of recurrent dislocation of the patella in children with MRI: Goldthwait technique combined with lateral release, and VMO advancement-a retrospective study of 85 knees.

Authors:  P Megremis; O Megremis
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-05-23

4.  Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament?

Authors:  Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Bharat Sharma; Simone Bignozzi; Nicola Lopomo; Francesca Colle; Stefano Zaffagnini; David Dejour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Morphology of the femoral insertion site of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Kotaro Fujino; Goro Tajima; Jun Yan; Youichi Kamei; Moritaka Maruyama; Sanjuro Takeda; Shuhei Kikuchi; Tadashi Shimamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark McCarthy; T J Ridley; Matthew Bollier; Brian Wolf; John Albright; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle R Duchman; Nicole A DeVries; Mark A McCarthy; Justin J Kuiper; Nicole M Grosland; Matthew J Bollier
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

8.  Comparative analysis of medial patellofemoral ligament length change pattern in patients with patellar dislocation using open-MRI.

Authors:  Yuji Arai; Shuji Nakagawa; Tetsuo Higuchi; Atsuo Inoue; Kuniaki Honjo; Hiroaki Inoue; Kazuya Ikoma; Keiichiro Ueshima; Takumi Ikeda; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Hee-Soo Kyung; Hee-June Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  An evaluation of the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using an anatomical tunnel site.

Authors:  Kars P Valkering; Aysha Rajeev; Nick Caplan; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Deiary F Kader
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.