Literature DB >> 22729250

Laparoscopic colorectomy for colorectal cancer: retrospective analysis of 889 patients in a single center.

Liesheng Lu1, Donglei Zhou, Xun Jian, Jianzhong Deng, Ping Yang, Weixing Ding.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic colectomy has been reported as an alternative for treatment of colorectal cancer. However, its long-term efficacy and safety remain obscure. The purpose here was to review our experience with laparoscopic colectomy in 899 patients between June 2001 and December 2008. Of them, 43 patients were converted to open surgery and 846 accepted laparoscopic colorectomy successfully. Among these 846 patients, 790 patients underwent radical resection and 56 patients underwent palliative resection. Only 1 patient died from perioperative pulmonary infection; thus the mortality was 0.12% (1/846). The morbidity of perioperative complications was 18.20% (154/846): intraoperative complication rate was 4.49% (38/846) and the most common intraoperative complication was subcutaneous emphysema and hypercapnia (1.65%, 14/846); postoperative complication rate was 13.71% (116/846) and the most common postoperative complication was ileus (4.37%, 37/846). The overall followed-up rate was 86.41% (731/846, 680 for radical operations and 51 palliative operations). Postoperative deaths happened to 139 patients, including 112 after radical operation and 27 after palliative resection. Of these 112 patients, 97 deaths were cancer-related (14.26%, 97/680) and 15 deaths were non-cancer-related. There were 10 patients encountered local recurrence (1.47%, 10/680) and 105 for metastasis (15.44%, 105/680) after radical operation. Forty-two patients are still alive with tumor. Overall survival rate was 80.98% (592/731), 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate after radical operation was 78.0%, and 3-year DFS rate after radical operation for stage I, stage II, and stage III was 89.0%, 85.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. In conclusion, laparoscopic colorectal resection is a feasible and safe technology for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729250     DOI: 10.1620/tjem.227.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med        ISSN: 0040-8727            Impact factor:   1.848


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.

Authors:  Ketao Jin; Jun Wang; Huanrong Lan; Ruili Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Comparative analysis of open and laparoscopic colectomy for malignancy in a developing country.

Authors:  Pierre-Anthony Leake; Kristen Pitzul; Patrick O Roberts; Joseph M Plummer
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-27

3.  Grossly delayed massive subcutaneous emphysema following laparoscopic left hemicolectomy: A case report.

Authors:  Angharad Jones; Umberto Pisano; Sherif Elsobky; Angus J M Watson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-12-02

4.  Effects of a multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Liping Liu; Na Lv; Chunmiao Hou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Indocyanine green-loaded injectable alginate hydrogel as a marker for precision cancer surgery.

Authors:  Seon Sook Lee; Hyunjin Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Joo Beom Eom; Young Seok Seo; Hong Man Yoon; Yongdoo Choi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

6.  Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hee Jong Lee; Kyo Sang Kim; Ji Seon Jeong; Jae Chul Shim; Eun Sun Cho
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-09-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.