Literature DB >> 22728276

Susceptibility of different cell lines to Avian and Swine Influenza viruses.

Tina Lombardo1, Silvia Dotti, Sabrina Renzi, Maura Ferrari.   

Abstract

Influenza outbreaks are widespread in swine and avian populations. Disease control is jeopardized by the extreme antigenic variability of virus strains. Primary isolation of Influenza virus is performed using embryonated chicken eggs (ECE), but alternatives to ECE are badly needed. Although various cultured cells have been used for propagating Influenza A viruses, few types of cells can efficiently support virus replication. One of the most commonly cell lines used in order to isolate Influenza A virus, is represented by the Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell line, but cells derived from primary swine organs (kidney, testicle, lung and trachea) can also be employed. The aim of this study was the evaluation of NSK, MDCK, UMNSAH/DF1 cell lines suitability, compared to ECE for isolation and propagation of Avian and Swine virus subtypes. The results indicated both NSK and MDCK could provide an appropriate substrate for cultivating either Avian (AIV) or Swine (SIV) Influenza virus strains, especially for high pathogenicity Avian Influenza ones. Furthermore, NSK appeared more susceptible than MDCK cells for primary isolation of AIV. In contrast, UMNSAH/DF1 cell line seemed to be less permissive to support Avian virus growth. Furthermore, no SIV replication was detected except for one subtype. Additionally, the results of this study indicated that not all virus strains seemed to adapt with the same efficiency to the different cell lines. On the contrary, chicken embryos were shown to be the most suitable biological system for AIV isolation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22728276     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  7 in total

1.  Accumulation and inactivation of avian influenza virus by the filter-feeding invertebrate Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Brandt W Meixell; Mark A Borchardt; Susan K Spencer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Detection and Isolation of Swine Influenza A Virus in Spiked Oral Fluid and Samples from Individually Housed, Experimentally Infected Pigs: Potential Role of Porcine Oral Fluid in Active Influenza A Virus Surveillance in Swine.

Authors:  Inge Decorte; Mieke Steensels; Bénédicte Lambrecht; Ann Brigitte Cay; Nick De Regge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence S Gazda; James Collins; Archie Lovatt; Robert W Holdcraft; Merribeth J Morin; Daniel Galbraith; Melanie Graham; Melissa A Laramore; Christine Maclean; John Black; Euan W Milne; Douglas G Marthaler; Horatiu V Vinerean; Michelle M Michalak; Deborah Hoffer; Steven Richter; Richard D Hall; Barry H Smith
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Madin-Darby canine kidney cell sialic acid receptor modulation induced by culture medium conditions: Implications for the isolation of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Sarah W Nelson; Joshua N Lorbach; Jacqueline M Nolting; Jason W Stull; Daral J Jackwood; Ian C Davis; Andrew S Bowman
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  A Systematic Review Analyzing the Prevalence and Circulation of Influenza Viruses in Swine Population Worldwide.

Authors:  Ravendra P Chauhan; Michelle L Gordon
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-08

6.  Comparative Susceptibility of Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) Derived Cell Lines for Isolation of Swine Origin Influenza A Viruses from Different Clinical Specimens.

Authors:  Matthew Suderman; Mariko Moniwa; Tamiru N Alkie; Davor Ojkic; Andre Broes; Neil Pople; Yohannes Berhane
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 7.  Cell Cultures for Virology: Usability, Advantages, and Prospects.

Authors:  Alexander A Dolskiy; Irina V Grishchenko; Dmitry V Yudkin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.