Literature DB >> 22728103

Lack of behavioral and cognitive effects of chronic ethosuximide and gabapentin treatment in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome.

V Vidal1, S García, P Martínez, A Corrales, J Flórez, N Rueda, A Sharma, C Martínez-Cué.   

Abstract

The Ts65Dn (TS) mouse model of Down syndrome (DS) displays a number of behavioral, neuromorphological and neurochemical phenotypes of the syndrome. Altered GABAergic transmission appears to contribute to the mechanisms responsible for the cognitive impairments in TS mice. Increased functional expression of the trisomic gene encoding an inwardly rectifying potassium channel, subfamily J, member 6 (KCNJ6) has been reported in DS and TS mice, along with the consequent impairment in GAB Aergic function. Partial display of DS phenotypes in mice harboring a single trisomy of Kcnj6 provides compelling evidence for a functional role of increased channel expression in some of the abnormal neurological phenotypes found in DS. Notably, the antiepileptic drug (AED) ethosuximide (ETH), but not other AEDs such as gabapentin (GAB), is known to inhibit KCNJ6 channels in mice. Here, we report the effect of chronic ETH and GAB on the behavioral and cognitive phenotypes of TS and disomic control (CO) mice. Neither drug significantly affected sensorimotor abilities, motor coordination or spontaneous activity in TS and CO mice. Also, ETH and GAB did not induce anxiety in the open field or plus maze tests, did not alter performance in the Morris water maze, and did not affect cued - or context - fear conditioning. Our results thus suggest that KCNJ6 may not be a promising drug target candidate in DS. As a corollary, they also show that long-term use of ETH and GAB is devoid of adverse behavioral and cognitive effects.
Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22728103     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prospects for improving brain function in individuals with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Alberto C S Costa; Jonah J Scott-McKean
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Genetic dissection of the Down syndrome critical region.

Authors:  Xiaoling Jiang; Chunhong Liu; Tao Yu; Li Zhang; Kai Meng; Zhuo Xing; Pavel V Belichenko; Alexander M Kleschevnikov; Annie Pao; Jennifer Peresie; Sarah Wie; William C Mobley; Y Eugene Yu
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  Mouse models of Down syndrome: gene content and consequences.

Authors:  Meenal Gupta; A Ranjitha Dhanasekaran; Katheleen J Gardiner
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Timing of therapies for Down syndrome: the sooner, the better.

Authors:  Fiorenza Stagni; Andrea Giacomini; Sandra Guidi; Elisabetta Ciani; Renata Bartesaghi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Opposite phenotypes of muscle strength and locomotor function in mouse models of partial trisomy and monosomy 21 for the proximal Hspa13-App region.

Authors:  Véronique Brault; Arnaud Duchon; Caroline Romestaing; Ignasi Sahun; Stéphanie Pothion; Mona Karout; Christelle Borel; Doulaye Dembele; Jean-Charles Bizot; Nadia Messaddeq; Andrew J Sharp; Damien Roussel; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Mara Dierssen; Yann Hérault
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Pharmacological approaches to improving cognitive function in Down syndrome: current status and considerations.

Authors:  Katheleen J Gardiner
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 7.  Enhanced GIRK2 channel signaling in Down syndrome: A feasible role in the development of abnormal nascent neural circuits.

Authors:  Alexander M Kleschevnikov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Weaker control of the electrical properties of cerebellar granule cells by tonically active GABAA receptors in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Marianna Szemes; Rachel L Davies; Claire Lp Garden; Maria M Usowicz
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.041

Review 9.  Rodent models in Down syndrome research: impact and future opportunities.

Authors:  Yann Herault; Jean M Delabar; Elizabeth M C Fisher; Victor L J Tybulewicz; Eugene Yu; Veronique Brault
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 5.758

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.