Literature DB >> 22727879

Sex differences in callosal transfer and hemispheric specialization for face coding.

Alice Mado Proverbio1, Roberta Mazzara, Federica Riva, Mirella Manfredi.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown a reduced lateralization of brain functions in women compared with men. Similarly, some studies have shown that the inter-hemispheric transfer (IHTT) of information is asymmetric in men, with faster latencies in the RH→LH compared with the LH→RH direction, and symmetric in women. The aim of the present study was to investigate IHTT and hemispheric lateralization during face processing in the two sexes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in strictly right-handed people (16 men and 17 women) engaged in a face-sex categorization task. Occipital P1 and occipito/temporal N170 were left lateralized in women and bilateral in men. Overall the data suggest a certain involvement of the LH in face feature analysis (possibly related to sex-coding) in both sexes. N170 to contralateral stimuli was larger over the RH in men and the LH in women. IHTT was approximately 4 ms at the P1 level and approximately 8 ms at the N170 level. It was asymmetric in men, with faster latencies in the left visual field (LVF)/RH→LH (170 ms) direction than in the right-visual field (RVF)/LH→RH (185 ms) direction and symmetric in women. These findings suggest that the asymmetry in callosal transfer times might be due to faster transmission times of face-related information via fibers departing from the more efficient to the less efficient hemisphere. Overall, our findings also support the notion that the transfer time of visual inputs might be more rapid and symmetric in women than in men.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727879     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  Facing stereotypes: ERP responses to male and female faces after gender-stereotyped statements.

Authors:  Pablo Rodríguez-Gómez; Verónica Romero-Ferreiro; Miguel A Pozo; José Antonio Hinojosa; Eva M Moreno
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Response inhibition is modulated by functional cerebral asymmetries for facial expression perception.

Authors:  Sebastian Ocklenburg; Vanessa Ness; Onur Güntürkün; Boris Suchan; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-22

3.  Gender difference in N170 elicited under oddball task.

Authors:  Damee Choi; Yuka Egashira; Jun'ya Takakura; Midori Motoi; Takayuki Nishimura; Shigeki Watanuki
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Estimation of gender-specific connectional brain templates using joint multi-view cortical morphological network integration.

Authors:  Nada Chaari; Hatice Camgöz Akdağ; Islem Rekik
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Sex Differences in Categorical Adaptation for Faces and Chinese Characters during Early Perceptual Processing.

Authors:  Cuiyin Zhu; Xiaoli Ma; Lihong Ji; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  How face blurring affects body language processing of static gestures in women and men.

Authors:  Alice Mado Proverbio; Laura Ornaghi; Veronica Gabaro
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.