Literature DB >> 22727841

Impact of preoperative embolization on outcomes of carotid body tumor resections.

Adam H Power1, Thomas C Bower, Jan Kasperbauer, Michael J Link, Gustavo Oderich, Harry Cloft, William F Young, Peter Gloviczki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed neurovascular complications in the surgical management of carotid body tumors (CBTs), with emphasis on those treated with and without preoperative embolization.
METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients with CBTs treated by surgical resection at our institution from 1985 to 2010. Outcomes were compared between Shamblin class II and III CBTs treated with preoperative embolization (EMB group) and with no preoperative embolization (NEMB group).
RESULTS: A total of 131 patients (80 women, 51 men), who were aged 48 years (range, 16-84 years), had resection of 144 CBTs and 12 concurrent cervical paragangliomas. This included 18 patients who had bilateral resections and 29 with familial CBTs. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) mutations were confirmed in 17 patients. Mean tumor volume was 20.5 cm(3) (range, 0.8-101.3 cm(3)), and there were two biochemically active CBTs (1%). There were 71 Shamblin II and 33 Shamblin III. The EMB group underwent 33 CBT resections, and the NEMB group underwent 71. There were more patients in the EMB group with bilateral (48% vs 22%; P = .01) and familial (34% vs 14%; P = .01) CBT; otherwise, patient demographics, Shamblin class, and tumor diameter and volumes were similar. No strokes or other major complications occurred after preoperative embolization with polyvinyl alcohol particles 1 day before surgery. The EMB group required less extensive procedures (simple excision in 97% vs 82%, P = .03; internal carotid artery clamping in 15% vs 37%, P = .04) and had less blood loss (mean estimated blood loss, 263 vs 599 mL; P = .002) than the NEMB group. However, there were no significant differences in operative time (250 vs 265 minutes; P = .49), temporary cranial nerve injury (52% vs 38%; P = .21), clinically apparent cranial nerve deficits after 1 year (12% vs 7%; P = .46), deaths (0% vs 0%; P > .99), stroke (0% vs 1%; P > .99), or postoperative length of stay (4.1 vs 4.2 days; P = .91).
CONCLUSIONS: Large CBTs can be resected safely with or without preoperative embolization. Preoperative embolization may simplify the conduct of the operation and reduce blood loss but does not decrease rates of cranial nerve injury, although most are temporary.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727841     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  35 in total

1.  Diagnosis and surgical treatment of carotid body tumor: A retrospective analysis of 58 patients.

Authors:  Qingquan Hua; Zhen Xu; Yang Jiang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  A Rare Case of Carotid Body Tumor Presenting with Internal Carotid Artery Blood Supply and Carotid Sinus Syndrome.

Authors:  Wen Li; Liu Yang; Hong Lyu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Carotid body tumors: a review of 25 years experience in diagnosis and management of 56 tumors.

Authors:  Amr Gad; Ahmed Sayed; Hussein Elwan; Fouad M S Fouad; Hussein Kamal Eldin; Hussein Khairy; Khaled Elhindawy; Ahmed Taha; Engie Hefnawy
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-30

4.  Imaging criteria to predict Shamblin group in carotid body tumors - revisited.

Authors:  Anitha Jasper; Suraj Mammen; Mahasampath S Gowri; Shyamkumar N Keshava; Dheepak Selvaraj
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Carotid Body Tumor Resection: Just as Safe without Preoperative Embolization.

Authors:  Adrienne N Cobb; Adel Barkat; Witawat Daungjaiboon; Pegge Halandras; Paul Crisostomo; Paul C Kuo; Bernadette Aulivola
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.466

6.  Multi-institutional survey of carotid body tumors in Japan.

Authors:  Aya Ikeda; Kiyoto Shiga; Katsunori Katagiri; Daisuke Saito; Jun Miyaguchi; Shin-Ichi Oikawa; Kodai Tsuchida; Takahiro Asakage; Hiroyuki Ozawa; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Naoki Ohtsuki; Yasushi Fujimoto; Ken-Ichi Kaneko
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  An evaluation on novel application of cone-beam CT imaging with multi-volume technique in carotid body tumor.

Authors:  Lijia Cui; Guangchao Gu; Linchao Ye; Bao Liu; Jiang Shao; Changwei Liu; Yuehong Zheng
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  A two-decade experience of head and neck paragangliomas in a whole population-based single centre cohort.

Authors:  T Anttila; V Häyry; T Nicoli; J Hagström; K Aittomäki; P Vikatmaa; M Niemelä; K Saarilahti; A Mäkitie; L J Bäck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  The Outcome of Multidisciplinary Management of Carotid Body Tumors: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ahmed Gaber Hassanein; Kamal A-A M Hassanein; Khalid Nasser Fadle; Ahmed Seif Al-Eslam; Fahd Nasser Al Qahtani
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-12-03

10.  Complications associated with carotid body tumor excision.

Authors:  Ali Kemal Gür; Mehmet Coşkun Aykaç; Mahmut Yarğı; Esra Eker
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.