Literature DB >> 22727674

Is human decision making under ambiguity guided by loss frequency regardless of the costs? A developmental study using the Soochow Gambling Task.

Ania Aïte1, Mathieu Cassotti, Sandrine Rossi, Nicolas Poirel, Amélie Lubin, Olivier Houdé, Sylvain Moutier.   

Abstract

Converging developmental decision-making studies have demonstrated that until late adolescence, individuals prefer options for which the risk of a loss is low regardless of the final outcome. Recent works have shown a similar inability to consider both loss frequency and final outcome among adults. The current study aimed to identify developmental changes in feedback-monitoring ability to consider both loss frequency and final outcome in decision making under ambiguity. Children, adolescents, and adults performed an adapted version of the Soochow Gambling Task. Our results showed that children and adolescents presented an exclusive preference for options associated with infrequent punishment. In contrast, only adults seemed to consider both loss frequency and the final outcome by favoring the advantageous options when the frequency of losses was low. These findings suggest that the ability to integrate both loss frequency and final outcome develops with age. Moreover, the analysis of strategic adjustments following gains and losses reveals that adults switch less often after losses compared with children and adolescents. This finding suggests that psychological tolerance to loss may facilitate learning the characteristics of each option and improve the ability to choose advantageously.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727674     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  10 in total

1.  Depression Risk Predicts Blunted Neural Responses to Gains and Enhanced Responses to Losses in Healthy Children.

Authors:  Katherine R Luking; David Pagliaccio; Joan L Luby; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 8.829

2.  The Influences of Described and Experienced Information on Adolescent Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Vinod Venkatraman; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2017-10-19

3.  Risky decision making from childhood through adulthood: Contributions of learning and sensitivity to negative feedback.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphreys; Eva H Telzer; Jessica Flannery; Bonnie Goff; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Dylan G Gee; Steve S Lee; Nim Tottenham
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-09-21

4.  Adolescents adapt more slowly than adults to varying reward contingencies.

Authors:  Amir Homayoun Javadi; Dirk H K Schmidt; Michael N Smolka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  "Hot" executive functions are comparable across monolingual and bilingual elementary school children: Results from a study with the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Susanne Enke; Catherine Gunzenhauser; Verena E Johann; Julia Karbach; Henrik Saalbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children's Sensitivity to Punishment.

Authors:  Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea; Anouk Scheres; Carlos Andres Tobon; Juliane Damm; Sandra Baez; David Huepe; Julian Marino; Sandra Marder; Facundo Manes; Sofia Abrevaya; Agustin Ibanez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stress effects on framed decisions: there are differences for gains and losses.

Authors:  Stephan Pabst; Matthias Brand; Oliver T Wolf
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Brain areas activated by uncertain reward-based decision-making in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Zongjun Guo; Juan Chen; Shien Liu; Yuhuan Li; Bo Sun; Zhenbo Gao
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 9.  What have we learned about the processes involved in the Iowa Gambling Task from developmental studies?

Authors:  Mathieu Cassotti; Ania Aïte; Anaïs Osmont; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-20

10.  Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Vinod Venkatraman; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.