Literature DB >> 22727622

Outcomes-based assessment of a new reference standard for delayed cerebral ischemia related to vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Pina C Sanelli1, Nikesh Anumula, Rachel Gold, Elliott Elias, Carl Johnson, Joseph Comunale, Apostolos J Tsiouris, Alan Z Segal.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The purpose is to perform outcomes-based assessment of a new reference standard for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) related to vasospasm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study was performed with consecutive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (A-SAH) patients between January 2002 and May 2009. A new reference standard for DCI was applied to the study population incorporating clinical and imaging criteria. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by chart diagnosis. Outcome measures for assessment included: permanent neurologic deficits, infarction, functional disability, treatment, and discharge status. Medical record review was performed by two blinded observers. Chi-square test calculated statistical significance between DCI and no DCI groups.
RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included; 59% (81/137) classified as DCI and 41% (56/137) as no DCI by the reference standard. Overall accuracy is 96% (95% confidence interval 92-99) with 100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 94% positive and 100% negative predictive values. Patients classified as DCI had 40% (32/81) permanent neurologic deficits and 57% (46/81) infarction compared to 0% (0/56) classified as no DCI. DCI patients had 33% (27/81) functional disability compared to 13% (7/56) classified as no DCI. Ninety-four percent (76/81) DCI patients received treatment compared to 0% (0/56) classified as no DCI. DCI group had 46% (37/81) discharged to rehabilitation facilities and 11% (9/81) mortality compared to 25% (14/56) and 2% (1/56), respectively, in no DCI group. There are statistically significant differences (P < .0001) between DCI and no DCI groups for all outcome measures.
CONCLUSION: This new reference standard has high diagnostic accuracy for DCI related to vasospasm. The outcomes-based assessment further supports its accuracy in correctly classifying A-SAH patients.
Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727622      PMCID: PMC3416968          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of cerebral vasospasm.

Authors:  R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Validation of a new reference standard for the diagnosis of vasospasm.

Authors:  Melissa Reichman; Rachel Gold; Edward Greenberg; Jana Ivanidze; Elliot Elias; Joseph Comunale; Apostolos J Tsiouris; Carl Johnson; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review.

Authors:  J W Hop; G J Rinkel; A Algra; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group.

Authors:  Mervyn D I Vergouwen; Marinus Vermeulen; Jan van Gijn; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Eelco F Wijdicks; J Paul Muizelaar; A David Mendelow; Seppo Juvela; Howard Yonas; Karel G Terbrugge; R Loch Macdonald; Michael N Diringer; Joseph P Broderick; Jens P Dreier; Yvo B W E M Roos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Defining vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is the most clinically relevant definition?

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera; Andres Fernandez; J Michael Schmidt; Jan Claassen; Katja E Wartenberg; Neeraj Badjatia; E Sander Connolly; Stephan A Mayer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Symptomatic vasospasm diagnosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage: evaluation of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and cerebral angiography as related to compromised vascular distribution.

Authors:  Jose I Suarez; Adnan I Qureshi; Abutaher B Yahia; Parak D Parekh; Rafael J Tamargo; Michael A Williams; John A Ulatowski; Daniel F Hanley; Alexander Y Razumovsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Developing patient-centered outcome measures for evaluating vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Melissa B Reichman; Eddie D Greenberg; Rachel L Gold; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Nazli Janjua; Stephan A Mayer
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.687

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evaluating blood-brain barrier permeability in delayed cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J Ivanidze; K Kesavabhotla; O N Kallas; D Mir; H Baradaran; A Gupta; A Z Segal; J Claassen; P C Sanelli
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: proposal of an evidence-based combined clinical and imaging reference standard.

Authors:  P C Sanelli; S Kishore; A Gupta; H Mangat; A Rosengart; H Kamel; A Segal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Standardized Classification of Cerebral Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage by Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Authors:  Helena Merkel; Dirk Lindner; Khaled Gaber; Svitlana Ziganshyna; Jennifer Jentzsch; Simone Mucha; Thilo Gerhards; Sabine Sari; Annika Stock; Felicitas Vothel; Lea Falter; Ulf Quäschling; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Jürgen Meixensberger; Dirk Halama; Cindy Richter
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.