Literature DB >> 22727177

Sustained delivery fluocinolone acetonide vitreous inserts provide benefit for at least 3 years in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Peter A Campochiaro1, David M Brown, Andrew Pearson, Sanford Chen, David Boyer, Jose Ruiz-Moreno, Bruce Garretson, Amod Gupta, Seenu M Hariprasad, Clare Bailey, Elias Reichel, Gisele Soubrane, Barry Kapik, Kathleen Billman, Frances E Kane, Kenneth Green.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term efficacy and safety of intravitreal inserts releasing 0.2 μg/d (low dose) or 0.5 μg/d (high dose) fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN: Two randomized, sham injection-controlled, double-masked, multicenter clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with persistent DME despite ≥1 macular laser treatment were randomized 1:2:2 to sham injection (n = 185), low-dose insert (n = 375), or high-dose insert (n = 393).
METHODS: Subjects received study drug or sham injection and after 6 weeks were eligible for rescue laser. Based on retreatment criteria, additional study drug or sham injections could be given after 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients with improvement of ≥15 letters from baseline. Secondary outcomes included other parameters of visual function and foveal thickness.
RESULTS: At month 36, the percentage of patients who gained ≥15 in letter score using the last observation carried forward method was 28.7% (low dose) and 27.8% (high dose) in the FAc insert groups compared with 18.9% (P = 0.018) in the sham group, and considering only those patients still in the trial at month 36, it was 33.0% (low dose) and 31.9% (high dose) compared with 21.4% in the sham group (P = 0.030). Preplanned subgroup analysis demonstrated a doubling of benefit compared with sham injections in patients who reported duration of DME ≥3 years at baseline; the percentage who gained ≥15 in letter score at month 36 was 34.0% (low dose; P<0.001) or 28.8% (high dose; P = 0.002) compared with 13.4% (sham). An improvement ≥2 steps in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study retinopathy scale occurred in 13.7% (low dose) and 10.1% (high dose) compared with 8.9% in the sham group. Almost all phakic patients in the FAc insert groups developed cataract, but their visual benefit after cataract surgery was similar to that in pseudophakic patients. The incidence of incisional glaucoma surgery at month 36 was 4.8% in the low-dose group and 8.1% in the high-dose insert group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DME FAc inserts provide substantial visual benefit for up to 3 years and would provide a valuable addition to the options available for patients with DME.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22727177     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  127 in total

Review 1.  Sustained-release steroids for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Alejandra Daruich; Alexandre Matet; Francine Behar-Cohen
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Therapeutic Options in Refractory Diabetic Macular Oedema.

Authors:  Sanket U Shah; Raj K Maturi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Ocular pharmacokinetics of fluocinolone acetonide following Iluvien implantation in the vitreous humor of rabbits.

Authors:  Frances E Kane; Kenneth E Green
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Glucocorticoid induction of occludin expression and endothelial barrier requires transcription factor p54 NONO.

Authors:  Jason M Keil; Xuwen Liu; David A Antonetti
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 6.  Diabetic retinopathy: current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Elia J Duh; Jennifer K Sun; Alan W Stitt
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 7.  Steroid-induced ocular hypertension/glaucoma: Focus on pharmacogenomics and implications for precision medicine.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Fini; Stephen G Schwartz; Xiaoyi Gao; Shinwu Jeong; Nitin Patel; Tatsuo Itakura; Marianne O Price; Francis W Price; Rohit Varma; W Daniel Stamer
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 8.  A proposal for early and personalized treatment of diabetic retinopathy based on clinical pathophysiology and molecular phenotyping.

Authors:  Thomas W Gardner; Jeffrey M Sundstrom
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Current treatments in diabetic macular oedema: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Alexander Ford; Noemi Lois; Pamela Royle; Christine Clar; Deepson Shyangdan; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Recent advances and unresolved challenges.

Authors:  Michael W Stewart
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.