Literature DB >> 22726733

Microscopically positive margins for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of risk factors and tumor recurrence.

Martin D McCarter1, Cristina R Antonescu, Karla V Ballman, Robert G Maki, Peter W T Pisters, George D Demetri, Charles D Blanke, Margaret von Mehren, Murray F Brennan, Linda McCall, David M Ota, Ronald P DeMatteo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the outcomes of patients with microscopically positive (R1) resections for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) because existing retrospective series contain small numbers of patients. The objective of this study was to analyze factors associated with R1 resection and assess the risk of recurrence with and without imatinib. STUDY
DESIGN: We reviewed operative and pathology reports for 819 patients undergoing resection of primary GIST from the North American branch of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z9000 and Z9001 clinical trials at 230 institutions testing adjuvant imatinib after resection of primary GIST. Patient, tumor, operative characteristics, factors associated with R1 resections, and disease status were analyzed.
RESULTS: Seventy-two (8.8%) patients had an R1 resection and were followed for a median of 49 months. Factors associated with R1 resection included tumor size (≥ 10 cm), location (rectum), and tumor rupture. The risk of disease recurrence in R1 patients was driven largely by the presence of tumor rupture. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival for patients undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection of GIST with (hazard ratio [HR] 1.095, 95% CI 0.66, 1.82, p = 0.73) or without (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.76, 2.99, p = 0.24) adjuvant imatinib.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 9% of 819 GIST patients had an R1 resection. Significant factors associated with R1 resection include tumor size ≥ 10 cm, location, and rupture. The difference in recurrence-free survival with or without imatinib therapy in those undergoing an R1 vs R0 resection was not statistically significant at a median follow-up of 4 years.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22726733      PMCID: PMC3383609          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  22 in total

1.  NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival.

Authors:  R P DeMatteo; J J Lewis; D Leung; S S Mudan; J M Woodruff; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  An audit of surgical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST).

Authors:  P Bucher; J-F Egger; P Gervaz; F Ris; D Weintraub; P Villiger; L H Buhler; Ph Morel
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Analysis of the prognostic significance of microscopic margins in 2,084 localized primary adult soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Alexander Stojadinovic; Denis H Y Leung; Axel Hoos; David P Jaques; Jonathan J Lewis; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Analysis of prognostic factors in 1,041 patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  P W Pisters; D H Leung; J Woodruff; W Shi; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  J P Pierie; U Choudry; A Muzikansky; B Y Yeap; W W Souba; M J Ott
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

7.  Local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma. A Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Project.

Authors:  C S Trovik
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  2001-02

8.  Prognostic factors influencing surgical management and outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  C Langer; B Gunawan; P Schüler; W Huber; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Clinical manifestations and prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Shee-Chan Lin; Ming-Jer Huang; Chen-Yuan Zeng; Tzang-In Wang; Zen-Liang Liu; Ray-Kuan Shiay
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Gastrointestinal sarcomas. Analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  P C McGrath; J P Neifeld; W Lawrence; S Kay; J S Horsley; G A Parker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  61 in total

1.  Microscopic positive tumor margin does not increase the rate of recurrence in endoscopic resected gastric mesenchymal tumors compared to negative tumor margin.

Authors:  Yan Zhu; Mei-Dong Xu; Chen Xu; Xiao-Cen Zhang; Shi-Yao Chen; Yun-Shi Zhong; Yi-Qun Zhang; Wei-Feng Chen; Tian-Yin Chen; Jia-Xin Xu; Li-Qing Yao; Quan-Lin Li; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Tailored management of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Mark S Etherington; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Peter Hohenberger; Michael Montemurro; Chandrajit P Raut; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-10-16

Review 4.  Tumor Biological Aspects of Epithelial versus Mesenchymal Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Chandrajit P Raut
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-10-28

5.  Laparoscopic resection of large gastric GISTs: feasibility and long-term results.

Authors:  Luigi Masoni; Ivan Gentili; Riccardo Maglio; Massimo Meucci; Giancarlo D'Ambra; Emilio Di Giulio; Giovanni Di Nardo; Vito Domenico Corleto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prognostic factors for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumours: are they the same in the multidisciplinary treatment era?

Authors:  Ferdinando C M Cananzi; Bruno Lorenzi; Ajay Belgaumkar; Charlotte Benson; Ian Judson; Satvinder Mudan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Advantages and hurdles.

Authors:  Hyung Hun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

8.  Surgical Strategy and Outcomes in Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

Authors:  Ser Yee Lee; Brian K P Goh; Eran Sadot; Rahul Rajeev; Vinod P Balachandran; Mithat Gönen; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Daniel Coit; Wai Keong Wong; Hock Soo Ong; Alexander Y F Chung; Ronald P DeMatteo
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Management of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kameyama; Tatsuo Kanda; Yosuke Tajima; Yoshifumi Shimada; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Takaaki Hanyu; Takashi Ishikawa; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-01

10.  Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase II and Ki-67 proteins in prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Li-Cheng Liu; Wen-Tong Xu; Xin Wu; Po Zhao; Ya-Li Lv; Lin Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.