Literature DB >> 22726556

Tuber-specific silencing of asparagine synthetase-1 reduces the acrylamide-forming potential of potatoes grown in the field without affecting tuber shape and yield.

Rekha Chawla1, Roshani Shakya, Caius M Rommens.   

Abstract

Simultaneous silencing of asparagine synthetase (Ast)-1 and -2 limits asparagine (ASN) formation and, consequently, reduces the acrylamide-forming potential of tubers. The phenotype of silenced lines appears normal in the greenhouse, but field-grown tubers are small and cracked. Assessing the effects of silencing StAst1 and StAst2 individually, we found that yield drag was mainly linked to down-regulation of StAst2. Interestingly, tubers from untransformed scions grafted onto intragenic StAst1/2-silenced rootstock contained almost the same low ASN levels as those in the original silenced lines, indicating that ASN is mainly formed in tubers rather than being transported from leaves. This conclusion was further supported by the finding that overexpression of StAst2 caused ASN to accumulate in leaves but not tubers. Thus, ASN does not appear to be the main form of organic nitrogen transported from leaves to tubers. Because reduced ASN levels coincided with increased levels of glutamine, it appears likely that this alternative amide amino acid is mobilized to tubers, where it is converted into ASN by StAst1. Indeed, tuber-specific silencing of StAst1, but not of StAst2, was sufficient to substantially lower ASN formation in tubers. Extensive field studies demonstrated that the reduced acrylamide-forming potential achieved by tuber-specific StAst1 silencing did not affect the yield or quality of field-harvested tubers.
© 2012 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal © 2012 Society for Experimental Biology, Association of Applied Biologists and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22726556     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00720.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


  22 in total

Review 1.  Genetically modified (GM) crops: milestones and new advances in crop improvement.

Authors:  Ayushi Kamthan; Abira Chaudhuri; Mohan Kamthan; Asis Datta
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 2.  New breeding technique "genome editing" for crop improvement: applications, potentials and challenges.

Authors:  Supriya B Aglawe; Kalyani M Barbadikar; Satendra K Mangrauthia; M Sheshu Madhav
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Carbon Dots for Efficient Small Interfering RNA Delivery and Gene Silencing in Plants.

Authors:  Steven H Schwartz; Bill Hendrix; Paul Hoffer; Rick A Sanders; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Potato improvement through genetic engineering.

Authors:  María Del Mar Martínez-Prada; Shaun J Curtin; Juan J Gutiérrez-González
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 5.  Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Krishan Kumar; Geetika Gambhir; Abhishek Dass; Amit Kumar Tripathi; Alla Singh; Abhishek Kumar Jha; Pranjal Yadava; Mukesh Choudhary; Sujay Rakshit
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  Photosynthetic assimilation of ¹⁴C into amino acids in potato (Solanum tuberosum) and asparagine in the tubers.

Authors:  Nira Muttucumaru; Alfred J Keys; Martin A J Parry; Stephen J Powers; Nigel G Halford
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  A Novel Moderate Constitutive Promoter Derived from Poplar (Populus tomentosa Carrière).

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Jia Wang; Mei-Xia Ye; Hao Li; Le-Xiang Ji; Ying Li; Dong-Qing Cui; Jun-Mei Liu; Xin-Min An
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Vacuolar invertase gene silencing in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) improves processing quality by decreasing the frequency of sugar-end defects.

Authors:  Xiaobiao Zhu; Craig Richael; Patrick Chamberlain; James S Busse; Alvin J Bussan; Jiming Jiang; Paul C Bethke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transcription factors, sucrose, and sucrose metabolic genes interact to regulate potato phenylpropanoid metabolism.

Authors:  Raja S Payyavula; Rajesh K Singh; Duroy A Navarre
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 10.  Reducing the potential for processing contaminant formation in cereal products.

Authors:  Tanya Y Curtis; Jennifer Postles; Nigel G Halford
Journal:  J Cereal Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.