BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prompt identification of parapneumonic effusions has immediate therapeutic benefits. We aimed to assess whether C-reactive protein (CRP) and routine biochemistries in pleural fluid are accurate markers of parapneumonic effusions, and to evaluate their properties as indicators for drainage (complicated parapneumonic effusion). METHODS: A retrospective review of 340 non-purulent parapneumonic effusions and 1,659 non-parapneumonic exudates from a single center was performed and the discriminative properties of pleural fluid routine biochemistries and, when available, CRP were evaluated. CRP, along with classical fluid parameters, was also applied to classify patients as having complicated or uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions. ROC analysis established the threshold of CRP for discriminating between groups. RESULTS: Pleural fluids with neutrophilic predominance and CRP levels >45 mg/dL were most likely to be parapneumonic in origin (likelihood ratio=7.7). When attempting to differentiate non-purulent complicated from uncomplicated effusions, a CRP >100mg/L had the same performance characteristics (area under the curve=0.81) as the widely accepted biochemistries pH and glucose. Combinations of CRP with pH or glucose resulted in incrementally discriminating values, pertaining to either sensitivity (75-80%) or specificity (97%), for complicated effusions. CONCLUSION: Pleural fluid CRP may be a useful adjunctive test in pleural effusions, both as a marker of parapneumonics and, particularly, as a differentiator between complicated and uncomplicated effusions.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prompt identification of parapneumonic effusions has immediate therapeutic benefits. We aimed to assess whether C-reactive protein (CRP) and routine biochemistries in pleural fluid are accurate markers of parapneumonic effusions, and to evaluate their properties as indicators for drainage (complicated parapneumonic effusion). METHODS: A retrospective review of 340 non-purulent parapneumonic effusions and 1,659 non-parapneumonic exudates from a single center was performed and the discriminative properties of pleural fluid routine biochemistries and, when available, CRP were evaluated. CRP, along with classical fluid parameters, was also applied to classify patients as having complicated or uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions. ROC analysis established the threshold of CRP for discriminating between groups. RESULTS:Pleural fluids with neutrophilic predominance and CRP levels >45 mg/dL were most likely to be parapneumonic in origin (likelihood ratio=7.7). When attempting to differentiate non-purulent complicated from uncomplicated effusions, a CRP >100mg/L had the same performance characteristics (area under the curve=0.81) as the widely accepted biochemistries pH and glucose. Combinations of CRP with pH or glucose resulted in incrementally discriminating values, pertaining to either sensitivity (75-80%) or specificity (97%), for complicated effusions. CONCLUSION:Pleural fluid CRP may be a useful adjunctive test in pleural effusions, both as a marker of parapneumonics and, particularly, as a differentiator between complicated and uncomplicated effusions.
Authors: Chang Dong Yeo; Jin Woo Kim; Mi Ran Cho; Ji Young Kang; Seung Joon Kim; Young Kyoon Kim; Sang Haak Lee; Chan Kwon Park; Sang Ho Kim; Mi Sun Park; Hyeon Woo Yim; Jong Y Park Journal: Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) Date: 2013-12-24
Authors: Shimon Izhakian; Walter G Wasser; Benjamin D Fox; Baruch Vainshelboim; Mordechai R Kramer Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Lucía Ferreiro; Óscar Lado-Baleato; Juan Suárez-Antelo; María Elena Toubes; María Esther San José; Adriana Lama; Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez; José Manuel Álvarez-Dobaño; Francisco J González-Barcala; Jorge Ricoy; Francisco Gude; Luis Valdés Journal: Ann Thorac Med Date: 2019 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.219