Literature DB >> 2272589

[Is an implant always necessary after enucleation?].

T Smit1, L Koornneef.   

Abstract

A retrospective study was performed on 114 patients who had received an intraorbital ball implant after removal of an eye: 44 had a primary implant inserted at the time of enucleation and 70 a secondary implant, inserted at a later date. We observed distinct advantages in the primary implantation group. Patients with a primary implant, an acrylic ball covered with sclera inserted within Tenon's capsule, had better cosmetic results and a lower complication rate and fewer needed any other therapeutic measures. Of the patients with primary implants 89% did not require further treatment, as against 51% with secondary implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2272589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0723-8045


  1 in total

Review 1.  Survey on the management of orbital and intraocular tumors among oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Priscilla Xinhui Wang; Victor Teck Chang Koh; Katherine Lun; Gangadhara Sundar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.