Literature DB >> 22725608

Deciphering µ-opioid receptor phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in HEK293 cells.

Christian Doll1, Florian Pöll, Kenneth Peuker, Anastasia Loktev, Laura Glück, Stefan Schulz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The molecular basis of agonist-selective signalling at the µ-opioid receptor is poorly understood. We have recently shown that full agonists such as [D-Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) stimulate the phosphorylation of a number of carboxyl-terminal phosphate acceptor sites including threonine 370 (Thr(370)) and serine 375 (Ser(375)), and that is followed by a robust receptor internalization. In contrast, morphine promotes a selective phosphorylation of Ser(375) without causing rapid receptor internalization. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Here, we identify kinases and phosphatases that mediate agonist-dependent phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the µ-opioid receptor using a combination of phosphosite-specific antibodies and siRNA knock-down screening in HEK293 cells. KEY
RESULTS: We found that DAMGO-driven phosphorylation of Thr(370) and Ser(375) was preferentially catalysed by G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) 2 and 3, whereas morphine-driven Ser(375) phosphorylation was preferentially catalysed by GRK5. On the functional level, inhibition of GRK expression resulted in enhanced µ-opioid receptor signalling and reduced receptor internalization. Analysis of GRK5-deficient mice revealed that GRK5 selectively contributes to morphine-induced Ser(375) phosphorylation in brain tissue. We also identified protein phosphatase 1γ as a µ-opioid receptor phosphatase that catalysed Thr(370) and Ser(375) dephosphorylation at or near the plasma membrane within minutes after agonist removal, which in turn facilitates receptor recycling. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Together, the morphine-activated µ-opioid receptor is a good substrate for phosphorylation by GRK5 but a poor substrate for GRK2/3. GRK5 phosphorylates µ-opioid receptors selectively on Ser(375), which is not sufficient to drive significant receptor internalization.
© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22725608      PMCID: PMC3504992          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.02080.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  58 in total

1.  C-terminal splice variants of the mouse mu-opioid receptor differ in morphine-induced internalization and receptor resensitization.

Authors:  T Koch; S Schulz; M Pfeiffer; M Klutzny; H Schröder; E Kahl; V Höllt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-05-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Dose-dependent conditioned place preference produced by etonitazene and morphine.

Authors:  M Sala; D Braida; P Calcaterra; M P Leone; E Gori
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06-24       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 3.  Role of receptor internalization in opioid tolerance and dependence.

Authors:  Thomas Koch; Volker Höllt
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 4.  From promiscuity to precision: protein phosphatases get a makeover.

Authors:  David M Virshup; Shirish Shenolikar
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Rapid dephosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors by protein phosphatase 1β is required for termination of β-arrestin-dependent signaling.

Authors:  Florian Pöll; Christian Doll; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Functional selectivity at the μ-opioid receptor: implications for understanding opioid analgesia and tolerance.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; Cullen L Schmid; Chad E Groer; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Morphine activates opioid receptors without causing their rapid internalization.

Authors:  D E Keith; S R Murray; P A Zaki; P C Chu; D V Lissin; L Kang; C J Evans; M von Zastrow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  The structure and regulation of protein phosphatases.

Authors:  P Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Morphine-induced mu-opioid receptor rapid desensitization is independent of receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestins.

Authors:  Ji Chu; Hui Zheng; Horace H Loh; Ping-Yee Law
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.315

10.  Opioid agonist efficacy predicts the magnitude of tolerance and the regulation of mu-opioid receptors and dynamin-2.

Authors:  Mohit Pawar; Priyank Kumar; Soujanya Sunkaraneni; Sunil Sirohi; Ellen A Walker; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Fine-tuning somatostatin receptor signalling by agonist-selective phosphorylation and dephosphorylation: IUPHAR Review 5.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Andreas Lehmann; Andrea Kliewer; Falko Nagel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Differential regulation of somatostatin receptor dephosphorylation by β-arrestin1 and β-arrestin2.

Authors:  Andrea Kliewer; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Sequence-Specific Regulation of Endocytic Lifetimes Modulates Arrestin-Mediated Signaling at the µ Opioid Receptor.

Authors:  Zara Y Weinberg; Amanda S Zajac; Tiffany Phan; Daniel J Shiwarski; Manojkumar A Puthenveedu
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Differentiation of opioid drug effects by hierarchical multi-site phosphorylation.

Authors:  Sascha Just; Susann Illing; Michelle Trester-Zedlitz; Elaine K Lau; Sarah J Kotowski; Elke Miess; Anika Mann; Christian Doll; Jonathan C Trinidad; Alma L Burlingame; Mark von Zastrow; Stefan Schulz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  Efficacy and ligand bias at the μ-opioid receptor.

Authors:  E Kelly
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  Cellular signalling of non-synonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the human μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1).

Authors:  Alisa Knapman; Mark Connor
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Morphine-induced trafficking of a mu-opioid receptor interacting protein in rat locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  Kellie M Jaremko; Nicholas L Thompson; Beverly A S Reyes; Jay Jin; Brittany Ebersole; Christopher B Jenney; Patricia S Grigson; Robert Levenson; Wade H Berrettini; Elisabeth J Van Bockstaele
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.067

8.  TRPV1 is a physiological regulator of μ-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Paul C Scherer; Nicholas W Zaccor; Neil M Neumann; Chirag Vasavda; Roxanne Barrow; Andrew J Ewald; Feng Rao; Charlotte J Sumner; Solomon H Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance.

Authors:  John T Williams; Susan L Ingram; Graeme Henderson; Charles Chavkin; Mark von Zastrow; Stefan Schulz; Thomas Koch; Christopher J Evans; Macdonald J Christie
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  Ethanol reversal of cellular tolerance to morphine in rat locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  Javier Llorente; Sarah Withey; Guadalupe Rivero; Margaret Cunningham; Alex Cooke; Kunal Saxena; Jamie McPherson; Sue Oldfield; William L Dewey; Chris P Bailey; Eamonn Kelly; Graeme Henderson
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.