Literature DB >> 22725259

A specific time course for mobilization of peripheral blood CD34+ cells after plerixafor injection in very poor mobilizer patients: impact on the timing of the apheresis procedure.

François Lefrère1, Laeticia Mauge, Delphine Réa, Jean-Antoine Ribeil, Liliane Dal Cortivo, Anne C Brignier, Charbel Aoun, Jérôme Larghéro, Marina Cavazzana-Calvo, Jean-Michel Micléa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report describes the specific kinetics of the peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell concentration in a selected group of very poor stem cell mobilizer patients treated with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor and determines the kinetics' impact on apheresis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients had previously experienced at least two failures of mobilization (without use of plerixafor). The present salvage therapy consisted in the administration of 10 µg/kg/day G-CSF for 5 days added to a dose of plerixafor administered at between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m. on Day 5. The PB CD34+ cell counts were tested every 3 hours thereafter. Apheresis was initiated as soon as the PB CD34+ cell count reached 10 × 10(6) /L.
RESULTS: A PB CD34+ cell count higher than 10 × 10(6) /L was observed as soon as 3 hours after plerixafor administration in 10 of the 11 patients who reached this threshold at some point in the monitoring process. Interestingly, all patients presented an early decrease in the PB CD34+ cell count 8 to 12 hours after plerixafor administration (below 10 × 10(6) /L for seven patients).
CONCLUSION: Had such patients been tested for PB CD34+ cell mobilization according to conventional criteria (i.e., 11 hr after plerixafor administration), apheresis would not have been performed at the optimal timing. For very poor stem cell mobilizer patients, early monitoring of PB CD34+ cell count may be required for the optimal initiation of apheresis.
© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22725259     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03744.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  11 in total

1.  The timing of plerixafor addition to G-Csf and chemotherapy affects immunological recovery after autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Curti; Roberto M Lemoli; Giulia Tolomelli; Katia Mancuso; Paola Tacchetti; Francesca Patriarca; Monica Galli; Lucia Pantani; Beatrice Zannetti; Maria Rosa Motta; Simonetta Rizzi; Elisa Dan; Barbara Sinigaglia; Valeria Giudice; Andrea Olmo; Mario Arpinati; Gabriella Chirumbolo; Renato Fanin; Russell E Lewis; Laura Paris; Francesca Bonifazi; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Prospective study of mobilization kinetics up to 18 hours after late-afternoon dosing of plerixafor.

Authors:  Patricia A Shi; Lorraine K Miller; Luis M Isola
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  The choice of in-hospital or home administration for plerixafor injection to poor mobilizers has no adverse consequence on subsequent hematopoietic stem cell harvest.

Authors:  C Chabannon; F Bijou; J-M Grouin; P Drillat; N Milpied; M Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Single Dose Preemptive Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization for ASCT After Lenalidomide Based Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: Impact in Resource Limited Setting.

Authors:  Rajiv Kumar; Rajan Kapoor; Bhushan Asthana; Jasjit Singh; Tarun Verma; Rajesh Chilaka; N K Singh; Ajay Sharma; S Das; Velu Nair
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 5.  Advances in stem cell mobilization.

Authors:  Rusudan K Hopman; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma: effectiveness in cases with very low circulating CD34+ cell levels and preemptive intervention vs remobilization.

Authors:  I Sánchez-Ortega; S Querol; M Encuentra; S Ortega; A Serra; J M Sanchez-Villegas; J R Grifols; M M Pujol-Balaguer; M Pujol-Bosch; J M Martí; T Garcia-Cerecedo; P Barba; J M Sancho; A Esquirol; J Sierra; R F Duarte
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 7.  Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update.

Authors:  Yavuz M Bilgin
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 8.  Getting blood out of a stone: Identification and management of patients with poor hematopoietic cell mobilization.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hillard M Lazarus; Parastoo B Dahi; Scott Avecilla; Sergio A Giralt
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 10.626

Review 9.  New insights in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Maria K Angelopoulou; Pantelis Tsirkinidis; Georgios Boutsikas; Theodoros P Vassilakopoulos; Panayiotis Tsirigotis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Plerixafor enables safe, rapid, efficient mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in sickle cell disease patients after exchange transfusion.

Authors:  Chantal Lagresle-Peyrou; François Lefrère; Elisa Magrin; Jean-Antoine Ribeil; Oriana Romano; Leslie Weber; Alessandra Magnani; Hanem Sadek; Clémence Plantier; Aurélie Gabrion; Brigitte Ternaux; Tristan Félix; Chloé Couzin; Aurélie Stanislas; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Lionel Lamhaut; Laure Joseph; Marianne Delville; Annarita Miccio; Isabelle André-Schmutz; Marina Cavazzana
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.