Literature DB >> 22724280

Analysis of clinical negligence claims following tonsillectomy in England 1995 to 2010.

Rajeev Mathew1, Eleni Asimacopoulos, David Walker, Tatiana Gutierrez, Peter Valentine, Lisa Pitkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We determined the characteristics of medical negligence claims following tonsillectomy.
METHODS: Claims relating to tonsillectomy between 1995 and 2010 were obtained from the National Health Service Litigation Authority database. The number of open and closed claims was determined, and data were analyzed for primary injury claimed, outcome of claim, and associated costs.
RESULTS: Over 15 years, there were 40 claims of clinical negligence related to tonsillectomy, representing 7.7% of all claims in otolaryngology. There were 34 closed claims, of which 32 (94%) resulted in payment of damages. Postoperative bleeding was the most common injury, with delayed recognition and treatment of bleeding alleged in most cases. Nasopharyngeal regurgitation as a result of soft palate fistulas or excessive tissue resection was the next-commonest cause of a claim. The other injuries claimed included dentoalveolar injury, bums, tonsillar remnants, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Inadequate informed consent was claimed in 5 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical negligence claims following tonsillectomy have a high success rate. Although postoperative bleeding is the most common cause of negligence claims, a significant proportion of claims are due to rare complications of surgery. Informed consent should be tailored to the individual patient and should include a discussion of common and serious complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22724280     DOI: 10.1177/000348941212100509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  5 in total

1.  Mortality after tonsil surgery, a population study, covering eight years and 82,527 operations in Sweden.

Authors:  Eirik Østvoll; Ola Sunnergren; Elisabeth Ericsson; Claes Hemlin; Elisabeth Hultcrantz; Erik Odhagen; Joacim Stalfors
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The NAtional randomised controlled Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults (NATTINA): a clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Isabel Rubie; Catherine Haighton; James O'Hara; Nikki Rousseau; Nick Steen; Deborah D Stocken; Frank Sullivan; Luke Vale; Scott Wilkes; Janet Wilson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Malpractice claims and unintentional outcome of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 4.  Adenoidectomy in Children: What Is the Evidence and What Is its Role?

Authors:  Alexander J Schupper; Javan Nation; Seth Pransky
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2018-03-02

Review 5.  Are errors in otorhinolaryngology always a sign of medical malpractice? Review of the literature and new perspectives in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) era.

Authors:  Polychronis Voultsos; Antonio Oliva; Simone Grassi; Debora Palmiero; Antonio Gioacchino Spagnolo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.