| Literature DB >> 22724034 |
Mary H Hodges1, Ricardo J Soares Magalhães, Jusufu Paye, Joseph B Koroma, Mustapha Sonnie, Archie Clements, Yaobi Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A national mapping of Schistosoma haematobium was conducted in Sierra Leone before the mass drug administration (MDA) with praziquantel. Together with the separate mapping of S. mansoni and soil-transmitted helminths, the national control programme was able to plan the MDA strategies according to the World Health Organization guidelines for preventive chemotherapy for these diseases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22724034 PMCID: PMC3378624 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001694
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Schistosoma haematobium prevalence and intensity of infection in schoolchildren by district in Sierra Leone.
| District | No of sites surveyed | No of children examined | Prevalence (%)(95% CI, minimum-maximum) | Arithmetic mean intensity of infection (eggs/10 ml) (95% CI) |
| Bo | 13 | 675 | 24.6 (21.5–28.0, 6.0–48.0) | 8.79 (5.69–11.88) |
| Bombali | 9 | 261 | 5.7 (3.5–9.3, 0–40.7) | 1.34 (0.0–3.04) |
| Bonthe | 2 | 106 | 0 | - |
| Kambia | 2 | 104 | 1 (0.2–5.3, 0–2) | 0.06 (0.0–0.18) |
| Kenema | 2 | 60 | 0 | - |
| Koinadugu | 5 | 230 | 20.4 (15.7–26.1, 0–56.3) | 3.53 (0.0–9.70) |
| Kono | 6 | 253 | 25.3 (20.3–31.0, 16.7–31.0) | 7.91 (2.77–13.04) |
| Moyamba | 2 | 105 | 0 | - |
| Port Loko | 2 | 100 | 2 (0.6–7.0, 2–2) | 0.22 (0.02–0.42) |
| Pujehun | 2 | 103 | 0 | - |
| Tonkolili | 3 | 89 | 0 | - |
| Rural WA | 2 | 105 | 1 (0.2–5.2, 0–2) | 0.01 (0.0–0.03) |
| Urban WA | 2 | 102 | 0 | - |
Figure 1Framework of analysis.
Figure 2Geographical distribution of urogenital schistosomiasis in Sierra Leone 2010.
Figure 3Semivariogram of residual spatial variation in S. haematobium prevalence in school-age children, Sierra Leone 2010.
Spatial effects for prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium infection in schoolchildren in Sierra Leone, 2009–2010.
| Variable | Posterior mean (95%CI) |
| Male (vs female) | −0.08 (−0.38, 0.21) |
| Age in years | −0.06 (−0.14, 0.03) |
| LST | 0.59 (−0.96, 2.16) |
| NDVI | −0.21 (−1.46, 1.12) |
| Population density | 0.01 (−1.18, 1.26) |
| PIWB | 0.53 (−1.26, 3.06) |
| Intercept | −2.74 (−4.48, −0.99) |
|
| 4.20 (0.77, 14.65) |
|
| 6.41 (2.41, 17.63) |
*: Variables were standardised to have mean = 0 and standard deviation = 1; CI = Bayesian credible interval; LST = Land Surface Temperature; NDVI = Normalised Difference Vegetation Index; PIWB = perennial inland water body.
Figure 4Predicted spatial distribution of urogenital schistosomiasis in Sierra Leone 2010.
Figure 5A scatter plot of the combined proportion with urogenital and intestinal schistosomiasis.
The X-axis shows the observed combined proportion and the Y-axis shows the difference between the predicted and observed proportion infected.
Figure 6Spatial variation in combined schistosomiasis prevalence based on the WHO guidelines.
Figure 7Spatial variation in treatment regimens for schistosomiasis and hookworm based on the WHO guidelines.