Literature DB >> 22723563

Assessment of disease activity in multiple sclerosis phenotypes with combined gadolinium- and superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging.

Thomas Tourdias1, Stéphanie Roggerone, Massimo Filippi, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Marco Rovaris, David H Miller, Klaus G Petry, Bruno Brochet, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Ernst-Wilhelm Radüe, Vincent Dousset.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions after the administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles among the clinical phenotypes of MS and over time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-four patients with MS (10 with relapsing and 14 with progressive forms) underwent clinical and gadolinium- and USPIO-enhanced MR examinations at baseline and 6-month follow-up. The number of lesions that enhanced with gadolinium alone, USPIO alone, or both was compared with the Pearson χ2 or Fisher exact test, and lesion sizes were compared with the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test. At 6-month follow-up, the lesion signal intensity on precontrast T1-weighted images and the enhancement after repeat injection of the contrast agent were compared with the baseline postcontrast imaging features by using the McNemar test.
RESULTS: Fifty-six lesions were considered active owing to contrast enhancement at baseline; 37 lesions (66%) in 10 patients enhanced with gadolinium. The use of USPIO helped detect 19 additional lesions (34%), and two additional patients were classified as having active disease. Thus, the use of both agents enabled detection of 51% (19 of 37 lesions) more lesions than with gadolinium alone. Enhanced lesions were more frequently observed in the relapsing compared with the progressive forms of MS (P<.0001). USPIO enhancement, in the form of ringlike patterns, could also be observed on T1-weighted images in patients with progressive MS, enabling the detection of five lesions in addition to the five detected with gadolinium in this phenotype. Lesions that enhanced with both contrast agents at baseline were larger (mean size, 6.5 mm±3.8; P=.001) and were more likely to persistently enhance at 6-month follow-up (seven of 27 lesions, P<.0001) compared with those that enhanced only with gadolinium (mean size, 4.9 mm±2.2; one of nine lesions) or USPIO (mean size, 3.5 mm±1.5; 0 of 17 lesions).
CONCLUSION: The combination of gadolinium and USPIO in patients with MS can help identify additional active lesions compared with the current standard, the gadolinium-only approach, even in progressive forms of MS. Lesions that enhance with both agents may exhibit a more aggressive evolution than those that enhance with only one contrast agent. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723563     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

Review 1.  Alzheimer's disease: pathophysiology and applications of magnetic nanoparticles as MRI theranostic agents.

Authors:  Houshang Amiri; Kolsoum Saeidi; Parvin Borhani; Arash Manafirad; Mahdi Ghavami; Valerio Zerbi
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 2.  Nanosized contrast agents to noninvasively detect kidney inflammation by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joshua M Thurman; Natalie J Serkova
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 3.  Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping of the cerebral vasculature using ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Jiani Hu; E Mark Haacke; Yulin Ge
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadali Dadfar; Karolin Roemhild; Natascha I Drude; Saskia von Stillfried; Ruth Knüchel; Fabian Kiessling; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Neuroinflammatory imaging biomarkers: relevance to multiple sclerosis and its therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Tourdias; Vincent Dousset
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  A Peptide Targeting Inflammatory CNS Lesions in the EAE Rat Model of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Claudine Boiziau; Macha Nikolski; Elodie Mordelet; Justine Aussudre; Karina Vargas-Sanchez; Klaus G Petry
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 8.  A comprehensive literatures update of clinical researches of superparamagnetic resonance iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Jean-Marc Idée
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-02

9.  In vivo nanoparticle imaging of innate immune cells can serve as a marker of disease severity in a model of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Klara Kirschbaum; Jana K Sonner; Matthias W Zeller; Katrin Deumelandt; Julia Bode; Rakesh Sharma; Thomas Krüwel; Manuel Fischer; Angelika Hoffmann; Milene Costa da Silva; Martina U Muckenthaler; Wolfgang Wick; Björn Tews; John W Chen; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Michael Platten; Michael O Breckwoldt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Using iron oxide nanoparticles to diagnose CNS inflammatory diseases and PCNSL.

Authors:  Brian T Farrell; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edit Dósa; Endre Rimely; Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Cynthia A Lacy; Eugene P Frenkel; Nancy D Doolittle; Paula M Jacobs; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.