Literature DB >> 22723479

Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences.

Erica L Morley1, Thomas Steinmann, Jérôme Casas, Daniel Robert.   

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster have bilateral antisymmetric antennae that receive the particle velocity component of an acoustic stimulus. Acoustic communication is important in their courtship, which takes place in the acoustic near-field. Here, the small size of the dipole sound source (the male wing) and the rapid attenuation rate of particle velocity produce a spatially divergent sound field with highly variable magnitude. Also, male and female D. melanogaster are not usually stationary during courtship, resulting in a variable directionality of the acoustic stimulus. Using both particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler vibrometry, we examined the stimulus flow around the head of D. melanogaster to identify the actual geometry of the acoustic input to the antennae and its directional response. We reveal that the stimulus changes in both magnitude and direction as a function of its angle of incidence. Remarkably, directionality is substantial, with inter-antennal velocity differences of 25 dB at 140 Hz. For an organism whose auditory receivers are separated by only 660 ± 51 μm (mean ± s.d.), this inter-antennal velocity difference is far greater than differences in intensity observed between tympanal ears for organisms of similar scale. Further, the mechanical sensitivity of the antennae changes as a function of the angle of incidence of the acoustic stimulus, with peak responses along axes at 45 and 315 deg relative to the longitudinal body axis. This work indicates not only that the flies are able to detect differential cues in signal direction, but also that the male song structure may not be the sole determinant of mating success; his spatial positioning is also crucial to female sound reception and therefore also perhaps to her decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723479     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.068940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  Functional Maps of Mechanosensory Features in the Drosophila Brain.

Authors:  Paola Patella; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Encoding of Wind Direction by Central Neurons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Marie P Suver; Andrew M M Matheson; Sinekdha Sarkar; Matthew Damiata; David Schoppik; Katherine I Nagel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Sound localization behavior in Drosophila melanogaster depends on inter-antenna vibration amplitude comparisons.

Authors:  Alexandra V Batchelor; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Active Mechanisms of Vibration Encoding and Frequency Filtering in Central Mechanosensory Neurons.

Authors:  Anthony W Azevedo; Rachel I Wilson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Female Drosophila melanogaster respond to song-amplitude modulations.

Authors:  Birgit Brüggemeier; Mason A Porter; Jim O Vigoreaux; Stephen F Goodwin
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.422

Review 6.  Neuronal encoding of sound, gravity, and wind in the fruit fly.

Authors:  Eriko Matsuo; Azusa Kamikouchi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Sensorimotor Transformations Underlying Variability in Song Intensity during Drosophila Courtship.

Authors:  Philip Coen; Marjorie Xie; Jan Clemens; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Fast intensity adaptation enhances the encoding of sound in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jan Clemens; Nofar Ozeri-Engelhard; Mala Murthy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.