Literature DB >> 22723073

[PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws: results of a survey in Germany].

H Goost1, K Kabir, D C Wirtz, C Deborre, T Karius, R Pflugmacher, E M W Koch, C Burger, C Fölsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anchorage of pedicle screws can be challenging in the osteoporotic spine. A promising technique are cement augumented pedicle screws. The goal of this study was to gain more information regarding application of pedicle screw augmentation in Germany.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of the National German Spine Congress 2009 were invited to participate in an internet-based anonymous survey regarding application of pedicle screw augmentation. The questionnaire was related to different aspects of materials and procedures for pedicle screw augmentation. The frequency of answers was divided according to the specialty state of the surgeons: orthopaedic and trauma surgeons vs. neurosurgeons. The Mantel-Haenszel test was applied to evaluate the differences between the groups. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: 69 (64 %) orthopaedic and trauma surgeons and 39 (36 %) neurosurgeons participated (n = 108). Nearly 80 % of the participants use cement-augmented pedicle screws in their daily practice. Almost 2/3 of the specialists apply cannulated screws or other special screws. The Expedium (Company) screws are particularly preferred. The insertion of screws is combined with kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in 20 % of the cases. The balloon kyphoplasty was applied most commonly. There was no statistical difference between the surgeon groups regarding the different techniques. The main indications for pedicle screw augmentation were osteoporosis, intraoperative findings as well as loosening of screws, and revision. The most frequently observed complication is cement extravasation into the spinal canal (28 %). The cost issue is considered as being important but unknown to most of the participants. It can be assumed that the use of pedicle screws in Germany is well established in spine surgery, without as yet a standard technique being established. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22723073     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall        ISSN: 1864-6697            Impact factor:   0.923


  6 in total

1.  [Augmentation with PMMA cement].

Authors:  K-D Kühn; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Cement augmentation of pedicle screws : Pros and cons].

Authors:  K J Schnake; T R Blattert; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature.

Authors:  U J Spiegl; C Josten; B M Devitt; C-E Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Screw-Related Complications After Instrumentation of the Osteoporotic Spine: A Systematic Literature Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Elke Rometsch; Maarten Spruit; Jack E Zigler; Venugopal K Menon; Jean A Ouellet; Christian Mazel; Roger Härtl; Kathrin Espinoza; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-01-03

6.  The Value of Cement Augmentation in Patients With Diminished Bone Quality Undergoing Thoracolumbar Fusion Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Joshua M Kolz; Brett A Freedman; Ahmad N Nassr
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.