OBJECTIVE: To assess patterns of reduced cortical thickness in different clinically defined variants of early-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) and to explore the hypothesis that these variants span a phenotypic continuum rather than represent distinct subtypes. METHODS: The case-control study included 25 patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), 15 patients with logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA), and 14 patients with early-onset typical amnestic AD (tAD), as well as 30 healthy control subjects. Cortical thickness was measured using FreeSurfer, and differences and commonalities in patterns of reduced cortical thickness were assessed between patient groups and controls. Given the difficulty of using mass-univariate statistics to test ideas of continuous variation, we use multivariate machine learning algorithms to visualize the spectrum of subjects and to assess separation of patient groups from control subjects and from each other. RESULTS: Although each patient group showed disease-specific reductions in cortical thickness compared with control subjects, common areas of cortical thinning were identified, mainly involving temporoparietal regions. Multivariate analyses permitted clear separation between control subjects and patients and moderate separation between patients with PCA and LPA, while patients with tAD were distributed along a continuum between these extremes. Significant classification performance could nevertheless be obtained when every pair of patient groups was compared directly. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of cortical thickness patterns support the hypothesis that different clinical presentations of AD represent points in a phenotypic spectrum of neuroanatomical variation. Machine learning shows promise for syndrome separation and for identifying common anatomic patterns across syndromes that may signify a common pathology, both aspects of interest for treatment trials.
OBJECTIVE: To assess patterns of reduced cortical thickness in different clinically defined variants of early-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) and to explore the hypothesis that these variants span a phenotypic continuum rather than represent distinct subtypes. METHODS: The case-control study included 25 patients with posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), 15 patients with logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA), and 14 patients with early-onset typical amnestic AD (tAD), as well as 30 healthy control subjects. Cortical thickness was measured using FreeSurfer, and differences and commonalities in patterns of reduced cortical thickness were assessed between patient groups and controls. Given the difficulty of using mass-univariate statistics to test ideas of continuous variation, we use multivariate machine learning algorithms to visualize the spectrum of subjects and to assess separation of patient groups from control subjects and from each other. RESULTS: Although each patient group showed disease-specific reductions in cortical thickness compared with control subjects, common areas of cortical thinning were identified, mainly involving temporoparietal regions. Multivariate analyses permitted clear separation between control subjects and patients and moderate separation between patients with PCA and LPA, while patients with tAD were distributed along a continuum between these extremes. Significant classification performance could nevertheless be obtained when every pair of patient groups was compared directly. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of cortical thickness patterns support the hypothesis that different clinical presentations of AD represent points in a phenotypic spectrum of neuroanatomical variation. Machine learning shows promise for syndrome separation and for identifying common anatomic patterns across syndromes that may signify a common pathology, both aspects of interest for treatment trials.
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Jonathan D Rohrer; Matthew J Clarkson; Gerard R Ridgway; Rachael I Scahill; Marc Modat; Jason D Warren; Sebastien Ourselin; Josephine Barnes; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2010 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: R Migliaccio; F Agosta; K Rascovsky; A Karydas; S Bonasera; G D Rabinovici; B L Miller; M L Gorno-Tempini Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: D F Tang-Wai; N R Graff-Radford; B F Boeve; D W Dickson; J E Parisi; R Crook; R J Caselli; D S Knopman; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-10-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stephen M Wilson; Jennifer M Ogar; Victor Laluz; Matthew Growdon; Jung Jang; Shenly Glenn; Bruce L Miller; Michael W Weiner; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Steven T Dekosky; Pascale Barberger-Gateau; Jeffrey Cummings; André Delacourte; Douglas Galasko; Serge Gauthier; Gregory Jicha; Kenichi Meguro; John O'brien; Florence Pasquier; Philippe Robert; Martin Rossor; Steven Salloway; Yaakov Stern; Pieter J Visser; Philip Scheltens Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Anna C van Loenhoud; Alle Meije Wink; Colin Groot; Sander C J Verfaillie; Jos Twisk; Frederik Barkhof; Bart van Berckel; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Rik Ossenkoppele Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Niklas Mattsson; Charlotte E Teunissen; Frederik Barkhof; Yolande Pijnenburg; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Cindee M Madison; Pia M Ghosh; William W Seeley; Elizabeth Mormino; Michael D Greicius; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Joel H Kramer; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Daniel R Schonhaut; Michael Schöll; Samuel N Lockhart; Nagehan Ayakta; Suzanne L Baker; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Andreas Lazaris; Averill Cantwell; Jacob Vogel; Miguel Santos; Zachary A Miller; Brianne M Bettcher; Keith A Vossel; Joel H Kramer; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Brain Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Daniel R Schonhaut; Suzanne L Baker; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Pia M Ghosh; Miguel Santos; Zachary A Miller; Brianne M Bettcher; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Owen R Phillips; Shantanu H Joshi; Fabrizio Piras; Maria Donata Orfei; Mariangela Iorio; Katherine L Narr; David W Shattuck; Carlo Caltagirone; Gianfranco Spalletta; Margherita Di Paola Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-01-23 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Brendan I Cohn-Sheehy; Renaud La Joie; Jacob W Vogel; Christiane Möller; Manja Lehmann; Bart N M van Berckel; William W Seeley; Yolande A Pijnenburg; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Joel H Kramer; Frederik Barkhof; Howard J Rosen; Wiesje M van der Flier; William J Jagust; Bruce L Miller; Philip Scheltens; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Mary M Machulda; Jennifer L Whitwell; Joseph R Duffy; Edythe A Strand; Pamela M Dean; Matthew L Senjem; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs Journal: Brain Lang Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 2.381