Literature DB >> 22722530

Postoperative depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus continuous oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized comparative trial.

Sopon Cheewadhanaraks1, Chainarong Choksuchat, Kriengsak Dhanaworavibul, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of postoperative depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) versus postoperative continuous oral contraceptive (OC) pills in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain.
METHODS: After a conservative surgery, 84 patients with symptomatic endometriosis were randomized to receive either intramuscular DMPA (150 mg) every 12 weeks for 24 weeks or continuous OC pills (ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg and gestodene 0.075 mg) daily for 24 weeks. At weeks 12 and 24 of the treatment phase, patients rated their satisfaction with treatment and reported pain improvement and adverse effects.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the percentages of patients who reported satisfaction between the DMPA group and the OC group at weeks 12 and 24 (92.9 vs. 90.5%, and 92.9 vs. 88.1%, respectively). The rates of withdrawal because of persistent pain or side effects in the two groups were similar. Pain scores improved significantly in both groups, but dysmenorrhea scores on a visual analog scale at week 24 were significantly higher in the OC group than in the DMPA group (p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: Both postoperative DMPA and postoperative OC pills for 24 weeks were found to be effective and acceptable options for treating endometriosis-associated pain.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22722530     DOI: 10.1159/000337713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Therapeutics for the Management of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Simone Ferrero; Fabio Barra; Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Comparative, open-label prospective study on the quality of life and sexual function of women affected by endometriosis-associated pelvic pain on 2 mg dienogest/30 µg ethinyl estradiol continuous or 21/7 regimen oral contraceptive.

Authors:  S Caruso; M Iraci; S Cianci; V Fava; E Casella; A Cianci
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Elizabeth Micks; Maria F Gallo; Jeffrey T Jensen; David A Grimes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-29

Review 4.  Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Tineke J Crawford; Shree Datta; Andrew Prentice
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 5.  Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Andrew M Kaunitz; Johannes Bitzer
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Progesterone receptor ligands for the treatment of endometriosis: the mechanisms behind therapeutic success and failure.

Authors:  Fernando M Reis; Larissa M Coutinho; Silvia Vannuccini; Frédéric Batteux; Charles Chapron; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 15.610

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.