OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment (VI) in adults aged ≥50 years in the Nakuru district of Kenya and to identify sociodemographic risk factors for these conditions. We also sought to validate the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) methodology. PARTICIPANTS: There were 5010 subjects enumerated for this study. Of these, 4414 participants underwent examination, for a response rate of 88.1%. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based survey. METHODS: Cluster random samplings with probability proportionate to size procedures were used to select a representative cross-sectional sample of adults aged ≥50 years. Each participant was interviewed, had distance visual acuity (VA) measured with reduced logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution tumbling-E chart, underwent autorefraction, and thereby had measurements of presenting, uncorrected, and best-corrected VA. All participants, regardless of vision, underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations including slit-lamp assessment and dilated retinal photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity of <6/12. RESULTS: A representative sample of 4414 adults were enumerated (response rate, 88.1%). The prevalence of blindness (VA < 3/60 in better eye) was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.1%) and of VI, 0.4% (95% CI, 0.3-0.7%); 8.1% (95% CI, 7.2-9.2%); and 5.1% (95% CI, 4.3-6.1%) were severely (<6/60-3/60), moderately (<6/18-6/60), or mildly (<6/12-6/18) visually impaired, respectively. Being male, having less education, having Kalenjin tribal origin, and being ≥80 years old were associated with increased blindness prevalence. Prevalence estimates were comparable to a RAAB performed in the same area 2 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides reliable estimates of blindness and VI prevalence in Nakuru. Older age and tribal origin were identified as predictors of these conditions. This survey validates the use of RAAB as a method of estimating blindness and VI prevalence.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment (VI) in adults aged ≥50 years in the Nakuru district of Kenya and to identify sociodemographic risk factors for these conditions. We also sought to validate the Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) methodology. PARTICIPANTS: There were 5010 subjects enumerated for this study. Of these, 4414 participants underwent examination, for a response rate of 88.1%. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, population-based survey. METHODS: Cluster random samplings with probability proportionate to size procedures were used to select a representative cross-sectional sample of adults aged ≥50 years. Each participant was interviewed, had distance visual acuity (VA) measured with reduced logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution tumbling-E chart, underwent autorefraction, and thereby had measurements of presenting, uncorrected, and best-corrected VA. All participants, regardless of vision, underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations including slit-lamp assessment and dilated retinal photographs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity of <6/12. RESULTS: A representative sample of 4414 adults were enumerated (response rate, 88.1%). The prevalence of blindness (VA < 3/60 in better eye) was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.1%) and of VI, 0.4% (95% CI, 0.3-0.7%); 8.1% (95% CI, 7.2-9.2%); and 5.1% (95% CI, 4.3-6.1%) were severely (<6/60-3/60), moderately (<6/18-6/60), or mildly (<6/12-6/18) visually impaired, respectively. Being male, having less education, having Kalenjin tribal origin, and being ≥80 years old were associated with increased blindness prevalence. Prevalence estimates were comparable to a RAAB performed in the same area 2 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides reliable estimates of blindness and VI prevalence in Nakuru. Older age and tribal origin were identified as predictors of these conditions. This survey validates the use of RAAB as a method of estimating blindness and VI prevalence.
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Hillary K Rono; Iain A T Livingstone; Helen A Weiss; Stewart Jordan; Hannah Kuper; Matthew J Burton Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Wanjiku Mathenge; Kevin Wing; Hillary Rono; Michael Gichangi; Helen A Weiss; David Macleod; Allen Foster; Matthew J Burton; Hannah Kuper Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Wanjiku Mathenge; John Buchan; Fatima Kyari; Tunde Peto; Hillary Rono; Helen A Weiss; David Macleod; Allen Foster; Matthew J Burton; Hannah Kuper Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Hassan Hashemi; Farhad Rezvan; AbbasAli Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Sara Soroush; Nooshin Dadbin; Mehdi Khabazkhoob Journal: Iran J Public Health Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 1.429
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Philip I Burgess; Abdull M Mahdi; Fatima Kyari; Matthew J Burton; Hannah Kuper Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Andrew Bastawrous; Mario Ettore Giardini; Nigel M Bolster; Tunde Peto; Nisha Shah; Iain A T Livingstone; Helen A Weiss; Sen Hu; Hillary Rono; Hannah Kuper; Matthew Burton Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.389