Literature DB >> 22721908

Repeated consumption of a large volume of liquid and semi-solid foods increases ad libitum intake, but does not change expected satiety.

P S Hogenkamp1, M Mars, A Stafleu, C de Graaf.   

Abstract

Food intake and a food's expected satiating effect initially rely on sensory attributes. People will learn about the food's satiating capacity by exposure. We investigated whether repeated consumption changed the expected satiety effects and intake of iso-energetic liquid and semi-solid foods. In a randomised cross-over study, participants (n=53; age: 21±2.9 y; BMI: 21.8±2.0 kg/m²) consumed one of two iso-energetic dairy foods (liquid or semi-solid) for breakfast in each 5-day test condition. Expectations regarding satiety were measured on days 1, 2, and 5. Foods were offered ad libitum on days 1 and 5 and in a fixed volume on days 2-4. Appetite sensations were rated up to 180 min after the start of the session on fixed time points. Expected satiety effects of the semi-solid food were higher than of the liquid food on all days (p<0.0001). Ad libitum intake of the liquid food was higher than of the semi-solid food on day 1 (liquid: 391±177 g, semi-solid: 277±98 g; p<0.0001) and day 5 (liquid: 477±161 g, semi-solid: 375±148 g; p<0.0001). On day 2, hunger was rated lower and fullness rated higher after the semi-solid compared with the liquid food; on day 4, no differences were observed (significant product∗ exposure interaction AUC). Changes in hunger and fullness indicated that the fixed volumes of liquid and solid food were perceived to be equally satiating after repeated consumption, but this did not result in the anticipated changes: expected satiety effects remained lower, and ad libitum intake higher for the liquid compared with the semi-solid food. The effect of texture on a food's expected satiety effects and its ad libitum intake appears to be large, also after repeated consumption. Expectations based on sensory cues are not easily changed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22721908     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  7 in total

1.  Effects of learning and food form on energy intake and appetitive responses.

Authors:  Joshua B Jones; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-06-21

2.  Energy-dense snacks can have the same expected satiation as sugar-containing beverages.

Authors:  Ashley A Martin; Liam R Hamill; Sarah Davies; Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Can the Palatability of Healthy, Satiety-Promoting Foods Increase with Repeated Exposure during Weight Loss?

Authors:  Katherene O-B Anguah; Jennifer C Lovejoy; Bruce A Craig; Malinda M Gehrke; Philip A Palmer; Petra E Eichelsdoerfer; Megan A McCrory
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 4.  From biology to behavior: a cross-disciplinary seminar series surrounding added sugar and low-calorie sweetener consumption.

Authors:  A C Sylvetsky; A Hiedacavage; N Shah; P Pokorney; S Baldauf; K Merrigan; V Smith; M W Long; R Black; K Robien; N Avena; C Gaine; D Greenberg; M G Wootan; S Talegawkar; U Colon-Ramos; M Leahy; A Ohmes; J A Mennella; J Sacheck; W H Dietz
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2019-04-11

5.  Acute effect of Melon Manis Terengganu peel powder on glycemic response, perceived satiety, and food intake: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ying Qian Ong; Sakinah Harith; Mohd Razif Shahril; Norshazila Shahidan; Hermizi Hapidin
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2022-08-08

6.  Fluid or fuel? The context of consuming a beverage is important for satiety.

Authors:  Keri McCrickerd; Lucy Chambers; Martin R Yeomans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Consuming Preloads with Different Energy Density and Taste Quality on Energy Intake and Postprandial Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Nurhazwani Salleh; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry; Ciaran G Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.