Literature DB >> 22720762

Interpersonal processes of care and cesarean delivery in two health care settings.

Nancy A Hessol1, Roxana Odouli, Gabriel J Escobar, Anita L Stewart, Elena Fuentes-Afflick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether interpersonal processes of care (IPC) were associated with cesarean delivery.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 1308 postpartum women at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Walnut Creek, CA (KP-WC), and San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) from 2004 to 2006. Using interview and medical record data, logistic regression analyses estimated the odds of cesarean delivery as a function of IPC domains.
RESULTS: After adjustment for demographic and reproductive factors, women at KP-WC who reported higher scores for their provider's "elicitation of patient concerns and responsiveness" were less likely to have delivered by cesarean, whereas women who reported higher scores for "empowerment and self-care" were more likely. At KP-WC, women who reported low English proficiency were less likely to have delivered by cesarean than women who reported high proficiency. At SFGH, none of the IPC measures were significant; however, younger age was associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery, whereas higher educational attainment was associated with an increased risk.
CONCLUSIONS: To reduce record-high rates of cesarean delivery, more emphasis should be placed on addressing the nonmedical factors associated with operative delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22720762      PMCID: PMC3482097          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  ACOG Practice Bulletin #54: vaginal birth after previous cesarean.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinas.

Authors:  Amy I Zlot; Debra J Jackson; Carol Korenbrot
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-03

3.  Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery.

Authors:  Judith H Chung; Thomas J Garite; Adele M Kirk; Amie L Hollard; Deborah A Wing; David C Lagrew
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Karna Murthy; William A Grobman; Todd A Lee; Jane L Holl
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 6.  NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.

Authors:  F Gary Cunningham; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Sarah S Brown; Thomas Michael Dean; Marilynn Frederiksen; Carol J Rowland Hogue; Tekoa King; Emily Spencer Lukacz; Laurence B McCullough; Wanda Nicholson; Nancy Frances Petit; Jeffrey Lynn Probstfield; Adele C Viguera; Cynthia A Wong; Sheila Cohen Zimmet
Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements       Date:  2010-03-10

7.  Interpersonal processes of care in diverse populations.

Authors:  A L Stewart; A Nápoles-Springer; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 8.  The ethical debate of maternal choice and autonomy in cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Helen O Williams
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

9.  Consumer assessment of the quality of interpersonal processes of prenatal care among ethnically diverse low-income women: development of a new measure.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; Carol C Korenbrot; Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Quality and equality in obstetric care: racial and ethnic differences in caesarean section delivery rates.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Sierra Washington; Miriam Kuppermann; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.980

View more
  4 in total

1.  The cesarean decision survey.

Authors:  Denise M Puia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

2.  Factors influencing women's perceptions of shared decision making during labor and delivery: Results from a large-scale cohort study of first childbirth.

Authors:  Laura B Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil; Kristen H Kjerulff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-01-05

3.  Maternal acculturation and the prenatal care experience.

Authors:  Elena Fuentes-Afflick; Roxana Odouli; Gabriel J Escobar; Anita L Stewart; Nancy A Hessol
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Patient-reported Communication Quality and Perceived Discrimination in Maternity Care.

Authors:  Laura Attanasio; Katy B Kozhimannil
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.983

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.