Literature DB >> 22720253

Cancer immunotherapy: Benefit and harm?

Dainius Characiejus1.   

Abstract

In this article, evidence is reviewed suggesting that the outcome of cancer immunotherapy depends on pre-treatment immune parameters of a patient. The results described in the article show that immunotherapy may prolong survival in certain subgroups of cancer patients, while in other subgroups a cancer-promoting effect of this treatment modality cannot be excluded.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22720253      PMCID: PMC3376986          DOI: 10.4161/onci.1.2.18183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly expanding area of research and clinical practice. Cytokines, monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and adoptive cell immunotherapy are increasingly being studied in trials and used in clinics. There is one aspect, however, which has been largely ignored in cancer immunotherapy studies: heterogeneity of survival rates among untreated patients. If this is taken into account, two questions remain to be answered. First, what is the role of immunological factors in determining the survival of untreated cancer patients? Second, do patients with good immunological prognostic factors benefit from immunotherapy? Regarding the clinical outcome, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most heterogeneous of adult malignancies. In general, outcome of patients with metastatic RCC is poor with the median survival of approximately 1 y. However, some primary tumors and metastases of RCC, especially pulmonary parenchymal lesions, may have periods with little or no growth during many months. A subset (from 10% to 20%) of patients with metastatic RCC survive 5 or more years., In the late nineties, our group has studied the prognostic significance of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in advanced RCC patients using flow cytometry. We found remarkable differences in overall survival of advanced RCC patients based on peripheral blood levels of CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes. In our analysis, the median overall survival of patients with < 30% CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes in the CD8+ subset was 23.5 mo (the “relatively good prognosis group”), whereas the median overall survival of patients with ≥ 30% CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes in the CD8+ subset was only 6 mo (the “bad prognosis group”). High expression of CD8 antigen distinguishes CD8+ T cells from CD8+ NK cells that have low expression of CD8. Expression of CD57 antigen on T lymphocytes is regarded as a marker of immune deficiency in patients with autoimmune disease, infectious diseases and cancer. Thus, differences in survival among untreated advanced RCC patients may depend on immunological factors, i.e., levels of CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes. During 1995–1999, interferon-α (IFNα) was just being introduced in Lithuania, and no strict guidelines toward its use for treatment of metastatic RCC were available. Due to considerable variability in approach to treatment of metastatic RCC patients in Lithuania, we were able to select subgroups of patients treated and non-treated with IFNα. Thus, we had the opportunity to perform a retrospective analysis of the predictive significance of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets for treatment with IFNα of patients with advanced RCC. Treatment with IFNα significantly increased the median overall survival of the “bad prognosis group” RCC patients (from 6 to 18.5 mo). In contrast, a trend toward decreased median overall survival was observed in the “relatively good prognosis group” after treatment with IFNα (13.6 mo of IFNα-treated patients vs. 23.5 mo of patients non-treated with IFNα). These our results suggest, that immunotherapy with IFNα may benefit patients with poor immunological prognostic factors, whereas this treatment may even be harmful for patients with good immunological prognostic factors. Thousands of melanoma patients have been enrolled in adjuvant IFNα trials with the aim to determine a statistically significant improvement in survival. In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials including a total of 8,122 patients, it was shown that treatment with IFNα statistically significantly improves the overall survival of high-risk melanoma patients with a risk reduction of 11%. However, it has to be taken into account that 60% of patients with stages II-III cutaneous melanoma survive 5 y without any treatment. Can these patients benefit from adjuvant IFNα therapy? Several published reports show that longer survival of melanoma patients is associated with increased levels of CD8+CD57+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood (for a review see ref. 7). However, to our knowledge, CD8+CD57+ T lymphocyte levels have never been measured in trials of adjuvant IFNα in high-risk melanoma. Our results have shown that pre-treatment levels of peripheral blood CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes remarkably predict the survival of high-risk melanoma patients after treatment with IFNα. Median overall survival of patients with < 23% CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes in the CD8+ subset was not reached at a median follow-up of 24.6 mo, whereas median overall survival of patients with > 23% CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes was only 14.2 mo. The detrimental effect of adjuvant IFNα in the latter group of patients cannot be excluded. In conclusion, our results reviewed in this article and the results by other authors (for a review see ref. 9) strongly suggest that the outcome of immunotherapy depends on pre-treatment immune parameters of a cancer patient. Immunotherapy may prolong survival in certain subgroups of patients, most likely in those with poor immunological prognostic factors. However, immunotherapy should be administered cautiously to patients with good immunological prognostic factors, because a cancer-promoting effect of this treatment modality cannot be excluded (for a review see ref. 7). Schematic outline of the implications of the data reviewed in this article is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Schematic outline of the implications of the data reviewed in this article. Depending on pre-treatment immune parameters, immunotherapy may prolong survival in one subgroup of patients, while in another subgroup survival may be decreased compared with non-treated patients. As a result, the total effect of the therapeutic intervention may be nullified.

Figure 1. Schematic outline of the implications of the data reviewed in this article. Depending on pre-treatment immune parameters, immunotherapy may prolong survival in one subgroup of patients, while in another subgroup survival may be decreased compared with non-treated patients. As a result, the total effect of the therapeutic intervention may be nullified. CD8+ T lymphocytes are well-documented effectors of tumor immunity. There is ample evidence on the prognostic significance of CD8+ lymphocytes within a tumor or in peripheral blood of cancer patients., Thus, numbers and maybe functional characteristics of CD8+ T lymphocytes or their subsets may reflect the immunologic reactivity of the cancer patient and predict beneficial or harmful effects of immunotherapy. Our results support the predictive significance of peripheral blood CD8highCD57+ lymphocyte levels, but more research is needed.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Interferon alpha adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali; Carlo R Rossi; Donato Nitti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  CD57+ T lymphocytes and functional immune deficiency.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Marco Bestagno; Oscar Burrone; Mario Petrini
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 3.  Prediction of response in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Dainius Characiejus; John J L Jacobs; Vita Pašukonienė; Nijolė Kazlauskaitė; Vita Danilevičiūtė; Mykolas Mauricas; Willem Den Otter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Prognostic significance of peripheral blood CD8highCD57+ lymphocytes in bladder carcinoma patients after intravesical IL-2.

Authors:  Dainius Characiejus; Vita Pasukoniene; John J L Jacobs; Rimantas Eidukevicius; Feliksas Jankevicius; Neringa Dobrovolskiene; Mykolas Mauricas; R Jeroen A Van Moorselaar; Willem Den Otter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 5.  Renal cell carcinoma: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Cynthia L Martel; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  CD8highCD57+ T lymphocytes in normal, healthy individuals are oligoclonal and respond to human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  E C Wang; P A Moss; P Frodsham; P J Lehner; J I Bell; L K Borysiewicz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  "First do no harm" and the importance of prediction in oncology.

Authors:  Dainius Characiejus; Jasmina Hodzic; John J L Jacobs
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Predictive value of CD8highCD57+ lymphocyte subset in interferon therapy of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dainius Characiejus; Vita Pasukoniene; Nijole Kazlauskaite; Konstantinas P Valuckas; Tadas Petraitis; Mykolas Mauricas; Willem Den Otter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Peripheral blood CD8highCD57+ lymphocyte levels may predict outcome in melanoma patients treated with adjuvant interferon-alpha.

Authors:  Dainius Characiejus; Vita Pasukoniene; Renata Jonusauskaite; Nijolek Azlauskaite; Eduardas Aleknavicius; Mykolas Mauricas; Willem Den Otter
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  The natural history of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a computer analysis.

Authors:  J B Dekernion; K P Ramming; R B Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Erika Vacchelli; José-Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Aitziber Buqué; Laura Senovilla; Elisa Elena Baracco; Norma Bloy; Francesca Castoldi; Jean-Pierre Abastado; Patrizia Agostinis; Ron N Apte; Fernando Aranda; Maha Ayyoub; Philipp Beckhove; Jean-Yves Blay; Laura Bracci; Anne Caignard; Chiara Castelli; Federica Cavallo; Estaban Celis; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Aled Clayton; Mario P Colombo; Lisa Coussens; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Alexander M Eggermont; Douglas T Fearon; Wolf H Fridman; Jitka Fučíková; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Jérôme Galon; Abhishek Garg; François Ghiringhelli; Giuseppe Giaccone; Eli Gilboa; Sacha Gnjatic; Axel Hoos; Anne Hosmalin; Dirk Jäger; Pawel Kalinski; Klas Kärre; Oliver Kepp; Rolf Kiessling; John M Kirkwood; Eva Klein; Alexander Knuth; Claire E Lewis; Roland Liblau; Michael T Lotze; Enrico Lugli; Jean-Pierre Mach; Fabrizio Mattei; Domenico Mavilio; Ignacio Melero; Cornelis J Melief; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Lorenzo Moretta; Adekunke Odunsi; Hideho Okada; Anna Karolina Palucka; Marcus E Peter; Kenneth J Pienta; Angel Porgador; George C Prendergast; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Nicholas P Restifo; Naiyer Rizvi; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Hans Schreiber; Barbara Seliger; Hiroshi Shiku; Bruno Silva-Santos; Mark J Smyth; Daniel E Speiser; Radek Spisek; Pramod K Srivastava; James E Talmadge; Eric Tartour; Sjoerd H Van Der Burg; Benoît J Van Den Eynde; Richard Vile; Hermann Wagner; Jeffrey S Weber; Theresa L Whiteside; Jedd D Wolchok; Laurence Zitvogel; Weiping Zou; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-12-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.