| Literature DB >> 22719940 |
Li Zhang1, Dangxiao Cheng, Ning Tao, Min Zhao, Fan Zhang, Yulin Yuan, Xiaoping Qiu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The distribution of HLA alleles and haplotypes varies widely between different ethnic populations and geographic areas. Before any genetic marker can be used in a disease-associated study it is therefore essential to investigate allelic frequencies and establish a genetic database. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22719940 PMCID: PMC3375274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map showing the sites of the populations used in this study.
1,Uyghur 2,Southern-Han 3,Tujia 4,Miao 5,Hui 6,Northern-Han 7,Bouyei 8,Shui 9,Bulang 10,Hani 11,Minnan 12,Taiwan-Aborigines 13,Middle-Han.
Observed and expected heterozygosity and Hardy–Weinbergsignificance for human leukocyte antigen-A, -B, and -DRB1loci in Tujia ethnicity.
| Locus | Observed heterozygosity | Expected heterozygosity | P value |
| A | 0.77419 | 0.76378 | 0.88 |
| B | 0.92742 | 0.87048 | 0.139839 |
| DRB1 | 0.85484 | 0.87178 | 0.711948 |
Allelic frequencies of HLA–A, B and DRB1 loci in Tujia population living in Wufeng region, China.
| HLA–A | Allelic Frequency | HLA–B | Allelic Frequency | HLA–DRB1 | Allelic Frequency |
| A*01 | 2.02% | B*07 | 2.02% | DRB1*01 | 2.02% |
| A*02 | 35.48% | B*13 | 9.68% | DRB1*04 | 9.27% |
| A*03 | 1.21% | B*15 | 15.73% | DRB1*07 | 3.63% |
| A*11 | 28.23% | B*27 | 0.40% | DRB1*08 | 8.87% |
| A*24 | 15.73% | B*35 | 1.21% | DRB1*09 | 25.81% |
| A*26 | 2.82% | B*37 | 1.61% | DRB1*3 | 0.4% |
| A*30 | 2.42% | B*38 | 1.21% | DRB1*10 | 1.61% |
| A*31 | 4.84% | B*39 | 3.63% | DRB1*11 | 8.47% |
| A*33 | 6.86% | B*40 | 25.00% | DRB1*12 | 10.89% |
| A*68 | 0.40% | B*44 | 2.02% | DRB1*13 | 6.05% |
| B*46 | 16.13% | DRB1*14 | 8.47% | ||
| B*48 | 1.21% | DRB1*15 | 12.9% | ||
| B*50 | 0.81% | DRB1*16 | 1.21% | ||
| B*51 | 5.65% | DRB1*17 | 0.4% | ||
| B*52 | 2.42% | ||||
| B*53 | 0.40% | ||||
| B*54 | 3.63% | ||||
| B*55 | 2.02% | ||||
| B*56 | 0.40% | ||||
| B*58 | 4.44% | ||||
| B*67 | 0.40% |
Main high-frequency HLA haplotypes and their frequencies of Tujia population (haplotype frequency ≥1%).
| HLA A-B | HaplotypeFrequency | HLA B-DRB1 | HaplotypeFrequency | HLA A-B-DRB1 | HaplotypeFrequency |
| A*02–B*39 | 2.02% | B*37- DRB1*10 | 1.61% | A*11- B*39- DRB1*08 | 1.21% |
| A*24–B*40 | 4.84% | B*40- DRB1*08 | 2.42% | A*11- B*13- DRB1*09 | 1.61% |
| A*11–B*39 | 1.61% | B*39- DRB1*08 | 1.21% | A*11- B*46- DRB1*12 | 2.02% |
| A*02–B*46 | 8.47% | B*40- DRB1*09 | 9.27% | A*11- B*15- DRB1*15 | 2.42% |
| A*02–B*13 | 3.63% | B*46- DRB1*14 | 2.02% | A*02- B*46- DRB1*09 | 4.84% |
| A*02–B*40 | 8.87% | B*13- DRB1*04 | 1.21% | A*31- B*51- DRB1*15 | 1.21% |
| A*11–B*15 | 6.45% | B*13- DRB1*11 | 1.61% | A*24- B*40- DRB1*09 | 1.21% |
| A*11–B*40 | 7.66% | B*15- DRB1*12 | 2.42% | A*33- B*58- DRB1*13 | 1.61% |
| A*33–B*58 | 4.44% | B*40- DRB1*13 | 1.61% | A*02- B*40 -DRB1*09 | 4.03% |
| A*11–B*13 | 4.44% | B*13- DRB1*09 | 2.02% | A*02- B*15- DRB1*09 | 2.02% |
| A*11–B*46 | 4.03% | B*46- DRB1*12 | 4.03% | A*24- B*40- DRB1*15 | 1.61% |
| A*02–B*15 | 6.05% | B*15- DRB1*08 | 1.21% | A*02- B*15- DRB1*11 | 1.61% |
| A*02–B*35 | 1.21% | B*40- DRB1*12 | 1.61% | A*11- B*40- DRB1*15 | 1.21% |
| A*24–B*46 | 2.42% | B*13- DRB1*12 | 1.61% | A*02- B*40- DRB1*08 | 1.21% |
| A*31–B*40 | 1.21% | B*15- DRB1*15 | 2.42% | A*11- B*40- DRB1*09 | 1.61% |
| A*31–B*51 | 2.42% | B*46- DRB1*09 | 6.45% | A*02- B*40- DRB1*04 | 1.61% |
| A*24–B*51 | 1.21% | B*13- DRB1*07 | 1.61% | A*11- B*15- DRB1*04 | 1.61% |
| A*02–B*54 | 1.21% | B*39- DRB1*15 | 1.21% | A*24- B*46- DRB1*12 | 1.21% |
| A*24–B*15 | 2.02% | B*46- DRB1*08 | 1.21% | A*24- B*15- DRB1*09 | 1.21% |
| A*24–B*55 | 1.21% | B*15- DRB1*09 | 3.63% | A*26- B*40- DRB1*09 | 1.21% |
| A*30–B*13 | 1.21% | B*40- DRB1*14 | 2.02% | ||
| A*26–B*40 | 1.21% | B*51- DRB1*15 | 1.61% | ||
| B*54- DRB1*14 | 1.61% | ||||
| B*58- DRB1*13 | 1.61% | ||||
| B*40- DRB1*11 | 1.21% | ||||
| B*15- DRB1*04 | 2.82% | ||||
| B*51- DRB1*09 | 1.61% | ||||
| B*40 DRB1*15 | 4.03% | ||||
| B*54- DRB1*09 | 1.21% | ||||
| B*15- DRB1*11 | 2.42% | ||||
| B*40- DRB1*04 | 2.02% | ||||
| Total | 77.84% | 72.56% | 36.28% |
Haplotype frequency and significant linkage disequilibrium parameter of HLA two-loci haplotypes in Tujia population of Wufang region, China.
| HLA A–B | HF | D′ | HLA B-DRB1 | HF | D′ |
| A*33–B*58 | 0.044355 | 100% | B*56- DRB1*14 | 0.004032 | 100% |
| A*02–B*35 | 0.012097 | 100% | B*37- DRB1*10 | 0.016129 | 100% |
| A*24–B*56 | 0.004032 | 100% | B*50- DRB1*07 | 0.008065 | 100% |
| A*68–B*53 | 0.004032 | 100% | B*58- DRB1*17 | 0.004032 | 100% |
| A*02–B*27 | 0.004032 | 100% | B*67- DRB1*15 | 0.004032 | 100% |
| A*11–B*50 | 0.008065 | 100% | B*27 -DRB1*04 | 0.004032 | 100% |
| A*24–B*67 | 0.004032 | 100% | B*53- DRB1*11 | 0.004032 | 100% |
| A*03–B*07 | 0.008065 | 0.66 | B*48- DRB1*15 | 0.008065 | 0.61728 |
| A*24–B*48 | 0.008065 | 0.60 | B*38- DRB1*08 | 0.008065 | 0.63422 |
| A*24–B*55 | 0.012097 | 0.53 | B*35- DRB1*04 | 0.008065 | 0.63259 |
| B*40- DRB1*16 | 0.008065 | 0.55556 |
Abbreviations: HF, haplotype frequency D′, relative linkage disequilibrium parameter.
Figure 2Phylogeny based on HLA allele frequencies.
Dendroram constructed by the neighbor-joining method showing the relationship between Tujia populations in Hubei with other populations in Chinese individuals of 12 regions based on the frequencies of HLA-A loci.
Figure 3Result of Principal component analysis.
Principal component analysis between Tujia population in Hubei with Chinese other 12 ethnic group based on the allelic frequencies of HLA-A loci.