| Literature DB >> 22719790 |
Hua Ren1, Veronica Collins, Sandy J Clarke, Jin-Song Han, Paul Lam, Fiona Clay, Lara M Williamson, K H Andy Choo.
Abstract
Tai chi exercise has been shown to improve physiological and psychosocial functions, well-being, quality of life, and disease conditions. The biological mechanisms by which tai chi exerts its holistic effects remain unknown. We investigated whether tai chi practice results in positive epigenetic changes at the molecular level. Design. The DNA methylation profiles of sixty CpG-dinucleotide marks in female tai chi practitioners (N = 237; 45-88 years old) who have been practising tai chi for three or more years were compared with those of age-matched control females (N = 263) who have never practised tai chi. Results. Six CpG marks originating from three different chromosomes reveal a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two cohorts. Four marks show losses while two marks show gains in DNA methylation with age in the controls. In the tai chi cohort all six marks demonstrate significant slowing (by 5-70%) of the age-related methylation losses or gains observed in the controls, suggesting that tai chi practice may be associated with measurable beneficial epigenetic changes. Conclusions. The results implicate the potential use of DNA methylation as an epigenetic biomarker to better understand the biological mechanisms and the health and therapeutic efficacies of tai chi.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22719790 PMCID: PMC3375016 DOI: 10.1155/2012/841810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Genetic loci and primer sequences used for DNA methylation analysis.
| Genetic locus | Primer | Primer sequence | Product size | Physical location | No. of CpGs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rad 50 | Forward | GGAGTTTTAGGATTAAGTTTTGGGA | 467 | Chr5: 131920312–131920779 | 18 |
| Reverse | CTACCAAAAAATCCTACCAACCAA | ||||
| 17p (subtel) | Forward | AGTGAGGAAGAGGTTTTTGGTTTAT | 229 | Chr17: 2774–3003 | 8 |
| Reverse | ACTAAACCCCTACAACTAAATCCCA | ||||
| G6PD | Forward | GGAAAAGTTGAGGTATGGAGTAGGT | 378 | ChrX: 153427381–153427759 | 8 |
| Reverse | TAAAACCCAAAACCAACAATTTCTA | ||||
| Xp13 (subtel) | Forward | TGGGTTTAGGTGTTATTGAGGATAG | 309 | ChrX: 34124–34433 | 2 |
| Reverse | CCCAATAAAAACCCTAAAAATTACA | ||||
| Ercc1 | Forward | TGTGTGTTTAGAATTTTGGTAGGGT | 413 | Chr19: 50619182–50619595 | 10 |
| Reverse | CTACTCAAATATCCCTTCCTCCAA | ||||
| Esr 1 | Forward | TGGTAGGTTGTATTTTTTTGATGGT | 265 | Chr6: 152169890–152170155 | 4 |
| Reverse | ATTTATCTCTCTTTCTATTTAATTCCCCC | ||||
| WRN | Forward | TTTGTTTTTAGGATATTGTGAGGATG | 444 | Chr8: 31009321–31009765 | 10 |
| Reverse | CAAAAATAAACTCTATCCCCAAACC |
Characteristics of the female participants*.
| Characteristics | Tai Chi ( | Control ( | Difference ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) (mean ± SD) | 64.6 ± 10.4 | 62.6 ± 10.9 | 0.71 |
| Education level | 0.59 | ||
| Secondary | 32 | 27 | |
| Tertiary | 31 | 31 | |
| Degree (university) | 35 | 40 | |
| Other | 3 | 2 | |
| Have children | 81 | 80 | 0.66 |
| Occupation | 0.14 | ||
| Employed | 36 | 42 | |
| Homemaker | 9 | 10 | |
| Retired | 54 | 45 | |
| Other | 1 | 3 | |
| Born in Australia | 71 | 70 | 0.83 |
| Ethnic background | 0.66 | ||
| European‡ | 90 | 89 | |
| Asian‡ | 5 | 6 | |
| Other | 5 | 5 | |
| Regular non-tai chi exercise | 86 | 85 | 0.99 |
| Do yoga or meditation | 3 | 4 | 0.37 |
| Smoke | 0.84 | ||
| Never smoked | 82 | 76 | |
| Smoked in the past | 15 | 19 | |
| Still smoking | 3 | 5 | |
| Medical conditions | |||
| Type 2 diabetes | 3 | 6 | 0.55 |
| Hypertension | 32 | 25 | 0.06 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 4 | 7 | 0.16 |
| Body mass index§ | 0.61 | ||
| Underweight | 14 | 12 | |
| Normal | 50 | 45 | |
| Overweight | 23 | 23 | |
| Obese | 13 | 20 | |
| Situational anxiety¶ | 32.8 ± 9.8 | 35.3 ± 11.4 | 0.04‡‡∗∗ |
| Perceived stress | 4.5 ± 2.6 | 4.8 ± 2.9 | 0.28‡‡ |
| Degree of stress†† | 7.2 ± 2.0 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | 0.32‡‡ |
*Self-report data from questionnaire.
†All values (except age) are given as a percentage of the total number of participants in the cohort.
‡“European” refers to both Northern and Southern European origins. “Asian” refers to Chinese and Indian origins.
§Body mass index (BMI) is weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Underweight (BMI < 18.5); normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9); overweight (BMI 25–29.9); obese (BMI ≥ 30).
¶Participants were asked to describe how they felt presently at the moment of answering the questionnaire using the state subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (mean ± SD), where the range of scores for the STAI is 20–80, 80 being the highest level of STAI.
Participants were asked to describe their feelings and thoughts during the last month at the time of answering the questionnaire using the Perceived Stress Scale (mean ± SD) on a scale of 0–16, 16 being the highest level of PSS.
††Participants were asked if they had experienced significant stressful life events in the past 12 months, for example, the death of someone close, diagnosis of a serious health condition in the participant or someone close. Values (mean ± SD) denote the degree of stress on a scale of 1–10, 10 being the highest level of stress.
**A significant difference between the tai chi and control cohorts.
‡‡ t-test was performed for these continuous data instead of the Chi-squared tests used for the other categorical data.
Reason(s) for practising tai chi*.
| Reasons | Tai chi cohort %†
|
|---|---|
| To help with a specific health problem | 26 |
| For relaxation | 63 |
| For physical wellbeing | 84 |
| For mental wellbeing | 65 |
| To feel good | 62 |
| Other | 8 |
*As reported in the questionnaire by the tai chi practitioners, who were asked to tick as many categories as applicable.
†Values are given as a percentage of the total number of participants in the tai chi cohort.
CpG marks showing a significant methylation difference between tai chi and control cohorts across age.
| CpG mark | Chromosomal location of CpG | Mean methylation difference (± SD) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Rad50_2 | Chr5: 131920753 | 0.081 ± 0.033 | 0.022 |
| 17P_7 | Chr17: 2913 (subtelomeric) | 0.019 ± 0.008 | 0.019 |
| G6PD_6 | ChrX: 153427632 | 0.027 ± 0.010 | 0.013 |
| G6PD_7 | ChrX: 153427612 | 0.038 ± 0.015 | 0.032 |
| Rad50_10 | Chr5: 131920606 | −0.025 ± 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Xp13_1 | ChrX: 34302 (subtelomeric) | −0.106 ± 0.032 | 0.016 |
Figure 1Comparison of DNA methylation profiles against age for CpG dinucleotide marks that show a significant difference between the tai chi and control cohorts. ((a), i–iv) CpG marks Rad50_2, 17p_7, G6PD_6, and G6PD_7, showing normal DNA methylation losses in the control cohort (green) across age. Slower loss rates are seen for these marks in the tai chi cohort (red), by up to 16.03%, 4.63%, 5.09%, and 5.23%, respectively, compared to those of the control cohort, as shown by the tables below the graphs. ((b), i-ii) CpG marks Rad50_10 and Xp13_1, showing normal age-related DNA methylation gains in the control cohort (green). Slower gain rates are seen for these marks in the tai chi cohort (red), by up to 70.68% and 18.46%, respectively, compared to those of the control cohort, as shown by the tables below the graphs. Values in the tables represent average DNA methylation values for the age categories indicated, based on the linear model represented by the fitted line. “% difference” denotes the difference between the tai chi and control values expressed as a percentage of the control value. As methylation results were not available for all the participants for the individual CpG marks, the numbers of participants included in these analyses were less than the total and are shown in brackets.