Literature DB >> 22719652

3,3'-Carbonyl-dipyridinium bis-(perchlorate).

Ya Zhang1, Ai-Min Li, Zhi-Wei Wang, Chong-Qing Wan.   

Abstract

In the title molecular salt, C(11)H(10)N(2)O(2+)·2ClO(4) (-), the complete cation is generated by crystallographic twofold symmetry. The dihedral angle between the pyridyl rings is 67.07 (7)°. The crystal structure features N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming sheets in the ab plane.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22719652      PMCID: PMC3379454          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812022817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the dipyridyl ketone dication, see: Crook & McElvain (1930 ▶); Favaro et al. (1990 ▶). For metal complexes of di-3-pyridyl ketone, see: Chen & Mak (2005 ▶); Chen et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C11H10N2O2+·2ClO4 M = 385.11 Orthorhombic, a = 8.5315 (3) Å b = 15.1772 (6) Å c = 5.6107 (2) Å V = 726.50 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.50 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.835, T max = 0.905 6343 measured reflections 1285 independent reflections 1235 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.028 wR(F 2) = 0.073 S = 1.10 1285 reflections 111 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.34 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 503 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.10 (10) Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812022817/bt5923sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812022817/bt5923Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812022817/bt5923Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H10N2O2+·2ClO4Dx = 1.760 Mg m3
Mr = 385.11Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, P21212Cell parameters from 256 reflections
a = 8.5315 (3) Åθ = 2.3–26.2°
b = 15.1772 (6) ŵ = 0.50 mm1
c = 5.6107 (2) ÅT = 296 K
V = 726.50 (5) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 20.40 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
F(000) = 392
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer1285 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1235 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.835, Tmax = 0.905k = −18→16
6343 measured reflectionsl = −6→6
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0315P)2 + 0.4015P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.073(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.34 e Å3
1285 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
111 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.019 (3)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 503 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: 0.10 (10)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.1257 (3)0.13417 (17)0.4051 (5)0.0416 (6)
H10.04080.16420.34020.050*
C20.1807 (3)0.05924 (17)0.2988 (4)0.0372 (6)
H20.13400.03810.16040.045*
C30.3062 (3)0.01520 (14)0.3985 (4)0.0317 (5)
H30.3449−0.03570.32740.038*
C40.3745 (3)0.04756 (14)0.6063 (4)0.0287 (5)
C50.3158 (3)0.12400 (15)0.7048 (4)0.0334 (5)
H50.36090.14740.84190.040*
C60.50000.00000.7390 (6)0.0308 (7)
N10.1948 (2)0.16399 (13)0.6032 (4)0.0386 (5)
H70.15910.21130.66770.046*
O10.50000.00000.9548 (4)0.0431 (6)
Cl10.30796 (6)0.32979 (4)1.13244 (10)0.03518 (19)
O20.2552 (3)0.31908 (15)0.8930 (4)0.0720 (7)
O30.1779 (3)0.33349 (15)1.2909 (4)0.0647 (6)
O40.4064 (2)0.25628 (13)1.1946 (4)0.0539 (6)
O50.3940 (3)0.41004 (13)1.1460 (5)0.0622 (6)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0318 (12)0.0470 (14)0.0461 (16)0.0021 (11)−0.0001 (12)0.0095 (13)
C20.0350 (13)0.0444 (14)0.0323 (12)−0.0082 (12)−0.0038 (11)0.0022 (10)
C30.0339 (11)0.0321 (12)0.0293 (11)−0.0041 (10)0.0037 (12)−0.0010 (10)
C40.0293 (11)0.0299 (11)0.0269 (11)−0.0019 (9)0.0043 (11)0.0025 (10)
C50.0348 (12)0.0336 (12)0.0319 (12)−0.0013 (11)0.0021 (11)−0.0022 (9)
C60.0346 (18)0.0289 (17)0.0288 (18)−0.0017 (15)0.0000.000
N10.0378 (10)0.0327 (10)0.0452 (12)0.0081 (10)0.0046 (10)−0.0007 (10)
O10.0499 (15)0.0537 (16)0.0259 (13)0.0073 (14)0.0000.000
Cl10.0335 (3)0.0328 (3)0.0393 (3)−0.0005 (2)0.0001 (3)−0.0034 (3)
O20.0990 (17)0.0660 (14)0.0511 (12)0.0026 (13)−0.0214 (12)−0.0129 (12)
O30.0620 (13)0.0551 (12)0.0770 (15)0.0139 (12)0.0314 (11)0.0109 (12)
O40.0398 (10)0.0402 (10)0.0817 (16)0.0070 (8)−0.0062 (10)−0.0008 (10)
O50.0604 (12)0.0403 (11)0.0858 (16)−0.0138 (9)−0.0075 (14)0.0029 (12)
C1—N11.337 (3)C5—N11.327 (3)
C1—C21.368 (4)C5—H50.9300
C1—H10.9300C6—O11.210 (4)
C2—C31.381 (4)C6—C4i1.491 (3)
C2—H20.9300N1—H70.8600
C3—C41.393 (3)Cl1—O31.423 (2)
C3—H30.9300Cl1—O51.4242 (19)
C4—C51.379 (3)Cl1—O21.426 (2)
C4—C61.491 (3)Cl1—O41.439 (2)
N1—C1—C2119.5 (2)C4—C5—H5120.2
N1—C1—H1120.2O1—C6—C4119.97 (14)
C2—C1—H1120.2O1—C6—C4i119.97 (14)
C1—C2—C3119.5 (2)C4—C6—C4i120.1 (3)
C1—C2—H2120.3C5—N1—C1123.1 (2)
C3—C2—H2120.3C5—N1—H7118.5
C2—C3—C4119.5 (2)C1—N1—H7118.5
C2—C3—H3120.2O3—Cl1—O5109.56 (14)
C4—C3—H3120.2O3—Cl1—O2110.31 (16)
C5—C4—C3118.7 (2)O5—Cl1—O2108.08 (15)
C5—C4—C6117.9 (2)O3—Cl1—O4109.53 (13)
C3—C4—C6123.2 (2)O5—Cl1—O4110.44 (12)
N1—C5—C4119.7 (2)O2—Cl1—O4108.90 (14)
N1—C5—H5120.2
N1—C1—C2—C30.4 (4)C5—C4—C6—O134.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.2 (3)C3—C4—C6—O1−141.03 (17)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.0 (3)C5—C4—C6—C4i−146.0 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C6174.0 (2)C3—C4—C6—C4i38.97 (17)
C3—C4—C5—N11.2 (3)C4—C5—N1—C1−0.6 (4)
C6—C4—C5—N1−174.1 (2)C2—C1—N1—C5−0.2 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H7···O20.862.222.907 (3)136
N1ii—H7ii···O40.862.342.967 (2)130
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H7⋯O20.862.222.907 (3)136
N1i—H7i⋯O40.862.342.967 (2)130

Symmetry code: (i) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Control of channel size for selective guest inclusion with inlaid anionic building blocks in a porous cationic metal-organic host framework.

Authors:  Xu-Dong Chen; Chong-Qing Wan; Herman H-Y Sung; Ian D Williams; Thomas C W Mak
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.