Literature DB >> 22719543

2-[({2-[(2-Hy-droxy-5-meth-oxy-benzyl-idene)amino]-eth-yl}imino)-meth-yl]-4-meth-oxy-phenol.

Ali Ourari, Lotfi Baameur, Sofiane Bouacida, Kamel Ouari.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C(18)H(20)N(2)O(4), contains one-half mol-ecule with an inversion center located at the centroid of the mol-ecule. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯π inter-actions, forming layers parallel to (101). An intra-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bond also occurs.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22719543      PMCID: PMC3379345          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812018405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of similar compounds see: Srinivasan et al. (1986 ▶); Moutet & Ourari (1997 ▶); Ourari et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C18H20N2O4 M = 328.36 Monoclinic, a = 15.0040 (12) Å b = 5.9722 (3) Å c = 9.3128 (8) Å β = 92.001 (3)° V = 833.98 (11) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 295 K 0.50 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer 3001 measured reflections 1664 independent reflections 1097 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.054 wR(F 2) = 0.167 S = 1.05 1664 reflections 111 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor 1997 ▶) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2002 (Burla et al., 2005 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Berndt, 2001 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812018405/bq2353sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812018405/bq2353Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812018405/bq2353Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H20N2O4F(000) = 348
Mr = 328.36Dx = 1.308 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1761 reflections
a = 15.0040 (12) Åθ = 1.0–26.4°
b = 5.9722 (3) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 9.3128 (8) ÅT = 295 K
β = 92.001 (3)°Prism, colorless
V = 833.98 (11) Å30.50 × 0.23 × 0.19 mm
Z = 2
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer1097 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: Enraf–Nonius FR590Rint = 0.021
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.7°
Detector resolution: 9 pixels mm-1h = −18→18
CCD rotation images, thick slices scansk = −6→7
3001 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
1664 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.167w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.101P)2 + 0.0006P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1664 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
111 parametersΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.08 (2)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.00544 (12)0.5332 (3)0.42227 (18)0.0554 (5)
H1A0.02370.4040.36740.066*
H1B−0.05110.5860.38160.066*
C30.13689 (11)0.6835 (3)0.32973 (18)0.0500 (5)
H30.13990.55370.27490.06*
C40.20642 (11)0.8520 (3)0.31789 (17)0.0488 (5)
C50.20521 (13)1.0483 (3)0.40154 (19)0.0545 (5)
C60.27360 (14)1.2037 (3)0.3894 (2)0.0620 (5)
H60.27311.33410.44390.074*
C70.34154 (14)1.1672 (3)0.2983 (2)0.0623 (5)
H70.38631.27390.29090.075*
C80.34469 (12)0.9719 (3)0.21605 (18)0.0542 (5)
C90.27715 (11)0.8166 (3)0.22553 (18)0.0515 (5)
H90.27840.6870.17020.062*
C100.42592 (14)0.7497 (3)0.0532 (3)0.0764 (7)
H10A0.43130.62630.1190.115*
H10B0.47810.7572−0.00330.115*
H10C0.37420.7287−0.00890.115*
N20.07208 (9)0.7091 (2)0.41315 (16)0.0544 (5)
O50.13958 (10)1.0889 (2)0.49361 (15)0.0712 (5)
H50.10370.98530.49030.107*
O80.41724 (10)0.9514 (2)0.13122 (15)0.0727 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0480 (10)0.0591 (10)0.0594 (11)−0.0045 (7)0.0065 (8)−0.0027 (8)
C30.0467 (10)0.0539 (9)0.0494 (10)0.0010 (7)0.0029 (8)−0.0004 (7)
C40.0494 (10)0.0483 (9)0.0486 (10)0.0007 (7)0.0001 (8)0.0034 (6)
C50.0598 (12)0.0495 (10)0.0541 (10)0.0057 (8)0.0025 (9)0.0020 (7)
C60.0718 (13)0.0466 (9)0.0672 (12)−0.0003 (8)−0.0038 (10)−0.0033 (8)
C70.0652 (12)0.0518 (10)0.0696 (12)−0.0104 (8)−0.0025 (10)0.0063 (9)
C80.0517 (11)0.0589 (10)0.0521 (10)−0.0062 (7)0.0040 (8)0.0086 (7)
C90.0546 (11)0.0514 (9)0.0488 (10)−0.0030 (7)0.0044 (9)−0.0013 (7)
C100.0628 (13)0.0883 (14)0.0793 (15)−0.0105 (10)0.0209 (11)−0.0118 (11)
N20.0486 (9)0.0571 (9)0.0578 (9)−0.0012 (6)0.0068 (7)−0.0004 (6)
O50.0726 (10)0.0631 (8)0.0789 (10)0.0062 (6)0.0182 (8)−0.0140 (6)
O80.0643 (9)0.0764 (9)0.0786 (10)−0.0194 (7)0.0215 (7)−0.0033 (7)
C1—N21.455 (2)C6—H60.93
C1—C1i1.515 (3)C7—C81.397 (2)
C1—H1A0.97C7—H70.93
C1—H1B0.97C8—O81.373 (2)
C3—N21.275 (2)C8—C91.379 (2)
C3—C41.456 (2)C9—H90.93
C3—H30.93C10—O81.415 (2)
C4—C91.405 (2)C10—H10A0.96
C4—C51.408 (2)C10—H10B0.96
C5—O51.350 (2)C10—H10C0.96
C5—C61.391 (3)O5—H50.82
C6—C71.366 (3)
N2—C1—C1i109.99 (18)C6—C7—C8120.91 (16)
N2—C1—H1A109.7C6—C7—H7119.5
C1i—C1—H1A109.7C8—C7—H7119.5
N2—C1—H1B109.7O8—C8—C9125.19 (16)
C1i—C1—H1B109.7O8—C8—C7115.64 (15)
H1A—C1—H1B108.2C9—C8—C7119.18 (17)
N2—C3—C4121.80 (15)C8—C9—C4120.69 (16)
N2—C3—H3119.1C8—C9—H9119.7
C4—C3—H3119.1C4—C9—H9119.7
C9—C4—C5119.26 (16)O8—C10—H10A109.5
C9—C4—C3120.03 (15)O8—C10—H10B109.5
C5—C4—C3120.68 (16)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
O5—C5—C6119.26 (16)O8—C10—H10C109.5
O5—C5—C4121.64 (16)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
C6—C5—C4119.10 (17)H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C7—C6—C5120.86 (16)C3—N2—C1119.31 (15)
C7—C6—H6119.6C5—O5—H5109.5
C5—C6—H6119.6C8—O8—C10117.41 (14)
N2—C3—C4—C9179.47 (16)C6—C7—C8—C91.2 (3)
N2—C3—C4—C51.4 (3)O8—C8—C9—C4178.87 (17)
C9—C4—C5—O5−178.94 (15)C7—C8—C9—C4−0.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5—O5−0.9 (3)C5—C4—C9—C8−0.2 (2)
C9—C4—C5—C60.8 (2)C3—C4—C9—C8−178.27 (15)
C3—C4—C5—C6178.82 (15)C4—C3—N2—C1−178.95 (15)
O5—C5—C6—C7179.38 (17)C1i—C1—N2—C3127.0 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7−0.3 (3)C9—C8—O8—C10−3.6 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C8−0.7 (3)C7—C8—O8—C10176.06 (17)
C6—C7—C8—O8−178.45 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O5—H5···N20.821.852.5844 (18)148
C10—H10C···Cgii0.962.643.521 (2)152
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg is the centroid of the C4–C9 ring.

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O5—H5⋯N20.821.852.5844 (18)148
C10—H10CCgi0.962.643.521 (2)152

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  Epoxidation of olefins with cationic (salen)manganese(III) complexes. The modulation of catalytic activity by substituents.

Authors:  K Srinivasan; P Michaud; J K Kochi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1986-04-01       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.