Literature DB >> 22719063

Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation.

Georg Nölker1, Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben, Bogdan Muntean, Jürgen Vogt, Dieter Horstkotte, Lara Dabiri Abkenari, Ferdi Akca, Tamas Szili-Torok.   

Abstract

AIMS: Studies have shown that remote magnetic navigation is safe and effective for ablation of atrial arrhythmias, although optimal outcomes often require frequent manual manipulation of a circular mapping catheter. The Vdrive robotic system ('Vdrive') was designed for remote navigation of circular mapping catheters to enable a fully remote procedure. This study details the first human clinical experience with remote circular catheter manipulation in the left atrium. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This was a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomized consecutive case series that included patients presenting for catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias. Remote systems were used exclusively to manipulate both the circular mapping catheter and the ablation catheter. Patients were followed through hospital discharge. Ninety-four patients were included in the study, including 23 with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), 48 with persistent AF, and 15 suffering from atrial tachycardias. The population was predominately male (77%) with a mean age of 60.5 ± 11.7 years. The Vdrive was used for remote navigation between veins, creation of chamber maps, and gap identification with segmental isolation. The intended acute clinical endpoints were achieved in 100% of patients. Mean case time was 225.9 ± 70.5 min. Three patients (3.2%) crossed over to manual circular mapping catheter navigation. There were no adverse events related to the use of the remote manipulation system.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that remote manipulation of a circular mapping catheter in the ablation of atrial arrhythmias is feasible and safe. Prospective randomized studies are needed to prove efficiency improvements over manual techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22719063     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  10 in total

1.  Remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: single-catheter technique or additional use of a circular mapping catheter?

Authors:  Dirk Vollmann; Lars Lüthje; Joachim Seegers; Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Jan Sohns; Christian Röver; Gerd Hasenfuß; Markus Zabel
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Differences In Tissue Injury and Ablation Outcomes In Atrial Fibrillation Patients - Manual versus Robotic Catheters.

Authors:  Georg Nölker; Dieter Horstkotte; Klaus Jürgen Gutleben
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-08-31

3.  Robotic ablation of atrial fibrillation with a new remote catheter system.

Authors:  Alexander Wutzler; Thomas Wolber; Abdul Shokor Parwani; Martin Huemer; Philipp Attanasio; Florian Blaschke; Laurent Haegeli; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Firat Duru; Leif-Hendrik Boldt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Magnetic Navigation Comparison With Conventional Approach During Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Tolga Aksu; Serdar Bozyel; Ebru Golcuk; Kývanc Yalin; Tumer Erdem Guler
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

5.  Remotely controlled steerable sheath improves result and procedural parameters of atrial fibrillation ablation with magnetic navigation.

Authors:  Abdelkarim Errahmouni; Decebal Gabriel Latcu; Sok-Sithikun Bun; Nicolas Rijo; Céline Dugourd; Nadir Saoudi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 5.214

6.  CathROB: A Highly Compact and Versatile Remote Catheter Navigation System.

Authors:  Laura Cercenelli; Barbara Bortolani; Emanuela Marcelli
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 1.781

7.  The Impact of Left Atrial Size in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Liu; Hai-Feng Shi; Jie Zheng; Ku-Lin Li; Xiao-Xi Zhao; Shi-Peng Dang; Ying Wu; Yan Cheng; Xiao-Yan Li; Zhi-Ming Yu; Ru-Xing Wang
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Remote Navigation for Complex Arrhythmia.

Authors:  Irina Suman-Horduna; Sonya V Babu-Narayan; Sabine Ernst
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Feasibility of remote magnetic navigation for epicardial ablation.

Authors:  P Abraham; L D Abkenari; E C H Peters; T Szili-Torok
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  The comparison between robotic and manual ablations in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wenli Zhang; Nan Jia; Jinzi Su; Jinxiu Lin; Feng Peng; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.