PURPOSE: The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) contributes to multiple pathologies, including diabetes, arthritis, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Despite the obvious need, no RAGE inhibitors are in common clinical use. Therefore, we developed a novel small RAGE antagonist peptide (RAP) that blocks activation by multiple ligands. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: RAGE and its ligands were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of human pancreatic tissues, and siRNA was used to analyze their functions. Interactions between RAGE and S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 were measured by ELISA. Three S100P-derived small antagonistic peptides were designed, synthesized, and tested for inhibition of RAGE binding. The effects of the peptide blockers on NFκB-luciferase reporter activity was used to assess effects on RAGE-mediated signaling. The most effective peptide was tested on glioma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) models. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the expression of RAGE and its ligands S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 in human PDAC. siRNA silencing of RAGE or its ligands reduced the growth and migration of PDAC cells in vitro. The most effective RAP inhibited the interaction of S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 with RAGE at micromolar concentrations. RAP also reduced the ability of the ligands to stimulate RAGE activation of NFκB in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, systemic in vivo administration of RAP reduced the growth and metastasis of pancreatic tumors and also inhibited glioma tumor growth. CONCLUSION: RAP shows promise as a tool for the investigation of RAGE function and as an in vivo treatment for RAGE-related disorders.
PURPOSE: The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) contributes to multiple pathologies, including diabetes, arthritis, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Despite the obvious need, no RAGE inhibitors are in common clinical use. Therefore, we developed a novel small RAGE antagonist peptide (RAP) that blocks activation by multiple ligands. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:RAGE and its ligands were visualized by immunohistochemical analysis of humanpancreatic tissues, and siRNA was used to analyze their functions. Interactions between RAGE and S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 were measured by ELISA. Three S100P-derived small antagonistic peptides were designed, synthesized, and tested for inhibition of RAGE binding. The effects of the peptide blockers on NFκB-luciferase reporter activity was used to assess effects on RAGE-mediated signaling. The most effective peptide was tested on glioma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) models. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the expression of RAGE and its ligands S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 in human PDAC. siRNA silencing of RAGE or its ligands reduced the growth and migration of PDAC cells in vitro. The most effective RAP inhibited the interaction of S100P, S100A4, and HMGB-1 with RAGE at micromolar concentrations. RAP also reduced the ability of the ligands to stimulate RAGE activation of NFκB in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, systemic in vivo administration of RAP reduced the growth and metastasis of pancreatic tumors and also inhibited glioma tumor growth. CONCLUSION:RAP shows promise as a tool for the investigation of RAGE function and as an in vivo treatment for RAGE-related disorders.
Authors: A Taguchi; D C Blood; G del Toro; A Canet; D C Lee; W Qu; N Tanji; Y Lu; E Lalla; C Fu; M A Hofmann; T Kislinger; M Ingram; A Lu; H Tanaka; O Hori; S Ogawa; D M Stern; A M Schmidt Journal: Nature Date: 2000-05-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Patrick C Mahon; Patrick Baril; Vipul Bhakta; Claude Chelala; Krishna Caulee; Tomohiko Harada; Nicholas R Lemoine Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-07-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Christian J Konopka; Marcin Woźniak; Jamila Hedhli; Anna Siekierzycka; Jarosław Skokowski; Rafał Pęksa; Marcin Matuszewski; Gnanasekar Munirathinam; Andre Kajdacsy-Balla; Iwona T Dobrucki; Leszek Kalinowski; Lawrence W Dobrucki Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mi Jin Kim; Marcelo R Vargas; Benjamin A Harlan; Kelby M Killoy; Lauren E Ball; Susana Comte-Walters; Monika Gooz; Yasuhiko Yamamoto; Joseph S Beckman; Luis Barbeito; Mariana Pehar Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Agbor Ndip; Fiona L Wilkinson; Edward B Jude; Andrew J M Boulton; M Yvonne Alexander Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: T Kwak; K Drews-Elger; A Ergonul; P C Miller; A Braley; G H Hwang; D Zhao; A Besser; Y Yamamoto; H Yamamoto; D El-Ashry; J M Slingerland; M E Lippman; B I Hudson Journal: Oncogene Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 9.867