Literature DB >> 22718096

Prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates by age and indication in Germany 2005-2006.

Andreas Stang1, Ray M Merrill, Oliver Kuss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Few studies have examined the age-specific use of hysterectomy by indication. The aim of this study was to provide detailed nationwide age-specific prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates for several indications in Germany, representing a population of 42 million women.
METHODS: Nationwide population-based diagnosis related group data of the years 2005 and 2006 were used to calculate the prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates by age and indication group.
RESULTS: Prevalence-corrected age-standardized hysterectomy rates (any indication) was 362.9 (295.0 for benign diseases of the genital tract and 44.0 for primary malignant tumors of the genital tract) per 100,000 person-year. Corrected hysterectomy rates become increasingly greater than the uncorrected hysterectomy rates, such that they are about 68 % greater for women in the age groups 75-79, 80-84, and 85-89 years. Age-specific hysterectomy rates showed quite different patterns depending on the indication of hysterectomy. For example, hysterectomy rates closely follow the cancer incidence rates up to age 44 for cervical cancer and age 69 for uterine cancer, diverging noticeably in ages thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates presented in this study provide a more accurate indication of the use of hysterectomy, which has implications in terms of costs and resource allocation. Understanding the role of hysterectomy in treating selected diseases across the age span is also important for patients and doctors as they consult together about an appropriate course of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718096     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer: a nationwide analysis of hospitalization rates in Germany 2005-2009.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal; Hans-Werner Hense; Nikolaus Becker; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Kathrine Dyhr Lycke; Johnny Kahlert; Rikke Damgaard; Ole Mogensen; Anne Hammer
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Patterns of hysterectomy in India: a national and state-level analysis of the Fourth National Family Health Survey (2015-2016).

Authors:  S Desai; A Shukla; D Nambiar; R Ved
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Educational level, prevalence of hysterectomy, and age at amenorrhoea: a cross-sectional analysis of 9536 women from six population-based cohort studies in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Alexander Kluttig; Susanne Moebus; Henry Völzke; Klaus Berger; Karin Halina Greiser; Doris Stöckl; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 5.  The End of the Hysterectomy Epidemic and Endometrial Cancer Incidence: What Are the Unintended Consequences of Declining Hysterectomy Rates?

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Lori Minasian; Anne-Michelle Noone
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.