Literature DB >> 22718029

The role of combined measurement of tissue mRNA levels of AMACR and survivin in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected prostate cancer.

May Al-Maghrebi1, Elijah O Kehinde, Jehoram T Anim, Mehraj Sheikh.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether the measurement of tissue mRNA levels of AMACR and survivin has a role in distinguishing prostate cancer (PCa) from benign lesions and high risk from low-risk PCa in men with suspected PCa.
METHODS: TRUS prostate biopsies from 170 patients with suspected PCa were used to measure the mRNA levels of AMACR and survivin using semi-quantitative RT-PCR technique. The diagnosis, staging and risk stratification of PCa was based on established clinical criteria. The ability of tissue mRNA levels to distinguish benign from malignant prostate and high- and low-risk PCa was assessed. The diagnostic value for the two genes was evaluated by calculating their individual and combined sensitivity and specificity, which were compared with that of PSA.
RESULTS: Histological examination showed 90/170 (53%) of patients had benign prostate pathology, while 80/170 (47%) had PCa. Tissue mRNA levels of both AMACR and survivin were able to distinguish benign from PCa biopsies (p<0.0001) and also high-risk from low-risk PCa cases (p<0.02, p<0.05, respectively). Compared with serum PSA levels, the combined use of tissue mRNA levels of AMACR and survivin yielded a higher detection specificity (84 vs. 22%).
CONCLUSION: Based on AMACR and survivin combined sensitivity and specificity, these mRNA markers can be used as an adjunct to distinguish patients with and without PCa and in men with PCa may help to identify those with low- or high-risk PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718029     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-012-0220-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  34 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Prostate biopsy: current status and limitations.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Statistical issues in the evaluation of screening and early detection modalities.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Identification of differentially expressed genes in human prostate cancer using subtraction and microarray.

Authors:  J Xu; J A Stolk; X Zhang; S J Silva; R L Houghton; M Matsumura; T S Vedvick; K B Leslie; R Badaro; S G Reed
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  P504S immunohistochemical detection in 405 prostatic specimens including 376 18-gauge needle biopsies.

Authors:  R Beach; A M Gown; M N De Peralta-Venturina; A L Folpe; H Yaziji; P G Salles; D J Grignon; G R Fanger; M B Amin
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  A novel diagnostic test for prostate cancer emerges from the determination of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme a racemase in prostatic secretions.

Authors:  P J Zielie; J A Mobley; R G Ebb; Z Jiang; R D Blute; S M Ho
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prostate cancer detection on urinalysis for alpha methylacyl coenzyme a racemase protein.

Authors:  Craig G Rogers; Gai Yan; Shan Zha; Mark L Gonzalgo; William B Isaacs; Jun Luo; Angelo M De Marzo; William G Nelson; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The prostate specific antigen era in the United States is over for prostate cancer: what happened in the last 20 years?

Authors:  Thomas A Stamey; Mitchell Caldwell; John E McNeal; Rosalie Nolley; Marci Hemenez; Joshua Downs
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Survivin expression is associated with features of biologically aggressive prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Yair Lotan; Hossein Saboorian; Seyed M Khoddami; Claus G Roehrborn; Kevin M Slawin; Raheela Ashfaq
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  6 in total

1.  AMACR: an emerging diagnostic and prognostic tool in systemic malignancies.

Authors:  Shailendra Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Prostate cancer: the need for biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Juliana Felgueiras; Joana Vieira Silva; Margarida Fardilha
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Urine Exosomal AMACR Is a Novel Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Detection at Initial Biopsy.

Authors:  Xin Jin; Jin Ji; Decao Niu; Yuchen Yang; Shuchun Tao; Lilin Wan; Bin Xu; Shuqiu Chen; Fubo Wang; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  ZBTB46, SPDEF, and ETV6: Novel Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  AbdulFattah Salah Fararjeh; Yen-Nien Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  DNA methylation status is more reliable than gene expression at detecting cancer in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  A Paziewska; M Dabrowska; K Goryca; A Antoniewicz; J Dobruch; M Mikula; D Jarosz; L Zapala; A Borowka; J Ostrowski
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Urine Sediment Analysis-Based α-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase Score: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Jin Ji; Xi Chen; Yalong Xu; Zhi Cao; Huan Xu; Chen Kong; Fubo Wang; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.