Literature DB >> 22717684

Evaluating pesticide effects on freshwater invertebrate communities in alpine environment: a model ecosystem experiment.

A Ippolito1, M Carolli, E Varolo, S Villa, M Vighi.   

Abstract

Pesticide loads in streams are potentially one of the most relevant stressors for macroinvertebrate communities. Nevertheless, real effects provoked at the community level are still largely unknown. Model ecosystems are frequently used as tools for the risk assessment of pesticides, especially for their regulation, however, they can be also applied to site-specific risk assessment in order to gain better understanding of the responses of aquatic ecosystems to chemical stress. In the present work, an experimental system was composed of 5 artificial streams that reproduced a mountain lotic environment under controlled conditions. This study was aimed to better understand, whether (and how) the biological community was influenced by pesticides pulse exposures. 5 mixture load events were simulated over the productive season (March-July 2010): biological community was regularly sampled and nominal concentrations of water were tested. The results were interpreted comparing the output of different metrics and statistical methodologies. The sensitivity of different metrics was analyzed considering single exposure events (maximum Toxic Units) as well as overall temporal trends. Results showed how some common taxonomic metrics (e.g. taxa richness, Shannon's index, total abundance of organisms, and the Extended Biotic Index) were not suitable to identify the effects of pesticides at community level. On the contrary EPT%, SPEAR(pesticide) and the Principal Response Curve methodology proved to be sensitive to this kind of stress, providing comparable results. Temporal trends of these metrics proved to be related to the concentration of chemicals. Remarkably, the first Principal Response Curve illustrates the trend followed by the most vulnerable species, while the second is more related to the trend of opportunistic species. A high potential risk for the invertebrate community was highlighted by a statistically significant decline of 40 points (comparison with the control) in both SPEAR(pesticide) and EPT%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22717684     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-012-0957-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  26 in total

1.  Fate and effects of the insecticide Dursban 4E in indoor Elodea-dominated and macrophyte-free freshwater model ecosystems: II. Secondary effects on community structure.

Authors:  T C Brock; M van den Bogaert; A R Bos; S W van Breukelen; R Reiche; J Terwoert; R E Suykerbuyk; R M Roijackers
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Ecotoxicology becomes stress ecology.

Authors:  Nico M Van Straalen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Influence of persistence period of an insecticide on recovery patterns of a zooplankton community in experimental ponds.

Authors:  T Hanazato; M Yasuno
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Application and validation of approaches for the predictive hazard assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures.

Authors:  Marion Junghans; Thomas Backhaus; Michael Faust; Martin Scholze; L H Grimme
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Ecological risk assessment: from book-keeping to chemical stress ecology.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Variability of pesticide exposure in a stream mesocosm system: macrophyte-dominated vs. non-vegetated sections.

Authors:  Mikhail A Beketov; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Spray drift of pesticides and stream macroinvertebrates: experimental evidence of impacts and effectiveness of mitigation measures.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Louise Hills
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Ecological vulnerability analysis: a river basin case study.

Authors:  A Ippolito; S Sala; J H Faber; M Vighi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Water quality and macroinvertebrate community response following pesticide applications in a banana plantation, Limon, Costa Rica.

Authors:  Luisa Eugenia Castillo; Eduardo Martínez; Clemens Ruepert; Candida Savage; Michael Gilek; Margareth Pinnock; Efrain Solis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Water quality objectives for mixtures of toxic chemicals: problems and perspectives.

Authors:  M Vighi; R Altenburger; A Arrhenius; T Backhaus; W Bödeker; H Blanck; F Consolaro; M Faust; A Finizio; K Froehner; P Gramatica; L H Grimme; F Grönvall; V Hamer; M Scholze; H Walter
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.291

View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysing chemical-induced changes in macroinvertebrate communities in aquatic mesocosm experiments: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Eduard Szöcs; Paul J Van den Brink; Laurent Lagadic; Thierry Caquet; Marc Roucaute; Arnaud Auber; Yannick Bayona; Matthias Liess; Peter Ebke; Alessio Ippolito; Cajo J F ter Braak; Theo C M Brock; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.823

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.