OBJECTIVE: To assess whether stroke rates among patients with retinal disease were influenced by the rapid and sequential uptakes of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Population-based, time series analysis using encrypted, linked healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included all patients aged 66 years or older with physician-diagnosed retinal disease in the previous 5 years between 2002 and 2010 (N = 116 388). A secondary analysis evaluated patients who had undergone photodynamic therapy (PDT) within the preceding year (N = 10 059). METHODS: We used segmented regression analysis to evaluate changes in the rate of hospitalization for ischemic stroke associated with the introduction of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. The stroke rate was compared across 3 mutually exclusive periods: the period before the availability of bevacizumab or ranibizumab, the period of bevacizumab dominant AMD therapy, and the period of ranibizumab dominant AMD therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Among patients with retinal disease, neither the trend nor the level of the stroke time series changed with the uptake of bevacizumab (trend change coefficient -0.0026 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects/month [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.0066 to 0.0014; P = 0.20]; level change coefficient, 0.036 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects [95% CI, -0.070 to 0.14; P = 0.51]), or ranibizumab (trend change coefficient: -0.0011 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects/month [95% CI, -0.0087 to 0.0065; P = 0.78]; level change coefficient: -0.017 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.11; P = 0.79]). Similar results were observed in the analysis restricted to patients with recent PDT and in analyses stratified on age, sex, history of stroke, and history of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for AMD was not associated with a change in the rate of hospitalization for stroke among Ontario seniors with retinal disease. Furthermore, stroke rates in the bevacizumab and ranibizumab periods were not different. These population-level results complement the findings of a recently published trial comparing bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and may assist clinicians and policy makers as they balance the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost of these 2 closely related treatments.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether stroke rates among patients with retinal disease were influenced by the rapid and sequential uptakes of bevacizumab and ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Population-based, time series analysis using encrypted, linked healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We included all patients aged 66 years or older with physician-diagnosed retinal disease in the previous 5 years between 2002 and 2010 (N = 116 388). A secondary analysis evaluated patients who had undergone photodynamic therapy (PDT) within the preceding year (N = 10 059). METHODS: We used segmented regression analysis to evaluate changes in the rate of hospitalization for ischemic stroke associated with the introduction of bevacizumab and ranibizumab. The stroke rate was compared across 3 mutually exclusive periods: the period before the availability of bevacizumab or ranibizumab, the period of bevacizumab dominant AMD therapy, and the period of ranibizumab dominant AMD therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke. RESULTS: Among patients with retinal disease, neither the trend nor the level of the stroke time series changed with the uptake of bevacizumab (trend change coefficient -0.0026 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects/month [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.0066 to 0.0014; P = 0.20]; level change coefficient, 0.036 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects [95% CI, -0.070 to 0.14; P = 0.51]), or ranibizumab (trend change coefficient: -0.0011 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects/month [95% CI, -0.0087 to 0.0065; P = 0.78]; level change coefficient: -0.017 stroke hospitalizations/1000 subjects [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.11; P = 0.79]). Similar results were observed in the analysis restricted to patients with recent PDT and in analyses stratified on age, sex, history of stroke, and history of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid uptake of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for AMD was not associated with a change in the rate of hospitalization for stroke among Ontario seniors with retinal disease. Furthermore, stroke rates in the bevacizumab and ranibizumab periods were not different. These population-level results complement the findings of a recently published trial comparing bevacizumab and ranibizumab, and may assist clinicians and policy makers as they balance the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost of these 2 closely related treatments.
Authors: Robert J Campbell; Sherif R El-Defrawy; Sudeep S Gill; Marlo Whitehead; Erica de L P Campbell; Philip L Hooper; Chaim M Bell; Martin W Ten Hove Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Robert J Campbell; Roseanne Sutherland; Shahriar Khan; Katharine M Doliszny; Philip L Hooper; Morgan Slater; Eliot Frymire; Baiju R Shah; Jennifer D Walker; Michael E Green Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2020-04-17
Authors: Robert J Campbell; Chaim M Bell; Susan E Bronskill; J Michael Paterson; Marlo Whitehead; Erica de L Campbell; Sudeep S Gill Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Nicole L Pratt; Emmae N Ramsay; Anna Kemp; Lisa M Kalisch-Ellett; Sepehr Shakib; Gillian E Caughey; Philip Ryan; Stephen Graves; Elizabeth E Roughead Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Ashkan Shoamanesh; Sarah R Preis; Alexa S Beiser; Carlos S Kase; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Sudha Seshadri; Jose R Romero Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Katarzyna Michalska-Małecka; Adam Kabiesz; Malgorzata W Kimsa; Barbara Strzałka-Mrozik; Maria Formińska-Kapuścik; Malgorzata Nita; Urszula Mazurek Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 4.458