BACKGROUND: Guidelines and mental healthcare models suggest the use of psychological treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care but systematic estimates of the effect sizes in primary care settings are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in primary care for anxiety disorders. METHOD: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Pubmed databases were searched in July 2010. Manuscripts describing psychological treatment for anxiety disorders/increased level of anxiety symptoms in primary care were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and if the psychological treatment was compared with a control group. RESULTS: In total, 1343 abstracts were identified. Of these, 12 manuscripts described an RCT comparing psychological treatment for anxiety with a control group in primary care. The pooled standardized effect size (12 comparisons) for reduced symptoms of anxiety at post-intervention was d = 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.84, p = 0.00, the number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.18]. Heterogeneity was significant among the studies (I 2 = 58.55, Q = 26.54, p < 0.01). The quality of studies was not optimal and missing aspects are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: We found a moderate effect size for the psychological treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care. Several aspects of the treatment are related to effect size. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects given the chronicity and recurrent nature of anxiety.
BACKGROUND: Guidelines and mental healthcare models suggest the use of psychological treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care but systematic estimates of the effect sizes in primary care settings are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of psychological therapies in primary care for anxiety disorders. METHOD: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Pubmed databases were searched in July 2010. Manuscripts describing psychological treatment for anxiety disorders/increased level of anxiety symptoms in primary care were included if the research design was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and if the psychological treatment was compared with a control group. RESULTS: In total, 1343 abstracts were identified. Of these, 12 manuscripts described an RCT comparing psychological treatment for anxiety with a control group in primary care. The pooled standardized effect size (12 comparisons) for reduced symptoms of anxiety at post-intervention was d = 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.84, p = 0.00, the number needed to treat (NNT) = 3.18]. Heterogeneity was significant among the studies (I 2 = 58.55, Q = 26.54, p < 0.01). The quality of studies was not optimal and missing aspects are summarized. CONCLUSIONS: We found a moderate effect size for the psychological treatment of anxiety disorders in primary care. Several aspects of the treatment are related to effect size. More studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects given the chronicity and recurrent nature of anxiety.
Authors: Kaitlin Lilienthal; Kyle Possemato; Jennifer Funderburk; Michael Wade; April Eaker; Gregory P Beehler Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Sati Mazumdar; Kaleab Z Abebe; Jordan F Karp; Eric J Lenze; Herbert C Schulberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Martin A Katzman; Pierre Bleau; Pierre Blier; Pratap Chokka; Kevin Kjernisted; Michael Van Ameringen; Martin M Antony; Stéphane Bouchard; Alain Brunet; Martine Flament; Sophie Grigoriadis; Sandra Mendlowitz; Kieron O'Connor; Kiran Rabheru; Peggy M A Richter; Melisa Robichaud; John R Walker Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Marit Knapstad; Linn Vathne Lervik; Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit Sæther; Leif Edvard Aarø; Otto Robert F Smith Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Jochen Gensichen; Thomas S Hiller; Jörg Breitbart; Tobias Teismann; Christian Brettschneider; Ulrike Schumacher; Alexander Piwtorak; Hans-Helmut König; Heike Hoyer; Nico Schneider; Mercedes Schelle; Wolfgang Blank; Paul Thiel; Michel Wensing; Jürgen Margraf Journal: Trials Date: 2014-04-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Kersti Ejeby; Ruslan Savitskij; Lars-Göran Ost; Anders Ekbom; Lena Brandt; Jonas Ramnerö; Marie Asberg; Lars G Backlund Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Kersti Ejeby; Ruslan Savitskij; Lars-Göran Ost; Anders Ekbom; Lena Brandt; Jonas Ramnerö; Marie Asberg; Lars G Backlund Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 2.581