Different mechanisms and mediators in different stages of osteoarthritis (OA) may be
involved in progression of the disease. Cross-sectional studies performed regarding
cartilage degradation in OA may therefore not be generalised to whole stages.
Koskinen and colleagues' study should be evaluated in light of this knowledge [1].I read with great interest Koskinen and colleagues' article about the role of
adiponectin on cartilage degradation in OA [1]. The authors showed that plasma adiponectin levels and adiponectin
released from OA cartilage were higher in patients with the radiographically more
severe OA. They suggested that adiponectin is associated with cartilage destruction
in OA [1]. Making an extrapolation based on a
cross-sectional study in order to account for the mechanism of cartilage degradation
in OA, however, may not be very accurate.Chondrocytes are often believed to exhibit aberrant behaviour and shift to other
phenotypes such as anabolic, catabolic or hypertrophic phenotypes over the course of
the disease, upon physiological and mechanical stress [2]. The level of biochemical markers and mediators involved in
the OA process differ for each one of these phases [3]. Some of these mediators are directly involved in the progression of
the OA process or they may be secondary changes in the course of OA. Koskinen and
colleagues showed that plasma adiponectin levels were higher in patients with grade
IV and V disease than those in patients with grade I, II and III disease (Ahlback
classification) [1]. It is my belief that
these results do not lead us to conclude that adiponectin could be accountable for
degradation of the cartilage. Rather, increased levels of adiponectin may be a
secondary phenomenon to the late stage of OA, which could be deemed an indication of
severity. Another explanation could be that increased levels of adiponectin may
serve as a protective response to the catabolic process in OA. The current
understanding of cytokines and growth factors has been shown incapable of
determining a single factor that could be responsible for all chondrocyte responses
[3].Another point to be raised in this study would be the effect of adiponectin on OA
cartilage and primary chondrocytes in vitro. Koskinen and
colleagues reported that adiponectin enhanced nitric oxide, IL-6, matrix
metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-3 production in primary OA
chondrocytes in a dose-dependent manner [1].
However, the authors only investigated factors involved in the degradation of
cartilage. Adiponectin may have a dual effect on cartilage homeostasis, because it
may also stimulate anabolic mediators such as tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase-1 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in addition to
catabolic mediators [4]. Adiponectin may be
involved in the joint metabolism by changing the balance of matrix
metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [4].In a cross-sectional study, as a result, studying a single molecule does not solve
the mystery of cartilage destruction. A more versatile approach is required to
determine the mechanism of cartilage destruction in OA.
Abbreviations
IL: interleukin; OA: osteoarthritis.
Competing interests
The author declares that they have no competing interests.
Authors: Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen; Suzi Hoegh-Madsen; Erik Dam; Kim Henriksen; Bodil Cecillie Sondergaard; Philippe Pastoureau; Per Qvist; Morten A Karsdal Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 2.631