Literature DB >> 22716032

Epithelial ingrowth after LASIK: clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift.

Christopher R Henry1, Ana Paula Canto, Anat Galor, Pravin K Vaddavalli, William W Culbertson, Sonia H Yoo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe clinical characteristics, risk factors, and visual outcomes in patients requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK.
METHODS: Consecutive, noncomparative, retrospective case series of eyes requiring flap lift for epithelial ingrowth following LASIK from June 2003 through July 2011 at a tertiary care, university-based eye hospital. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 1 and 3 months and recurrence of epithelial ingrowth.
RESULTS: Forty-five eyes were included. Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment was the most common etiologic factor for epithelial ingrowth (28/45 eyes [62%]). All patients were treated with flap lift and scraping. Mean logMAR UDVA at presentation was 0.28 (Snellen equivalent 20/38). Mean logMAR UDVA at 3 months was 0.17 (Snellen equivalent 20/30) with 53% of eyes 20/25 or better. Mean logMAR CDVA at 3 months was 0.06 (Snellen equivalent 20/23) with 78% of eyes 20/25 or better. Epithelial ingrowth into the central cornea portended a trend towards UDVA worse than 20/25 or worse at 3-month follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] 5.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-31.3, P=.05) and CDVA worse than 20/25 at 3-month follow-up (HR 4.32, 95% CI: 0.85-21.9, P=.08). Recurrence after treatment was 31% at 3 months and 36% at 1 year. Risk factors for recurrence included: infectious etiology of ingrowth (HR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.11-29.1, P=.04), use of microkeratome for primary LASIK (HR 4.64, 95% CI: 1.07-20.1, P=.04), and hyperopic primary LASIK (HR 2.49, 95% CI: 0.98-6.31, P=.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing flap lift for the treatment of epithelial ingrowth have a relatively high rate of recurrence but good visual acuity outcomes. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22716032     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20120604-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  8 in total

1.  Late-onset traumatic dislocation of laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flaps: a case series with many clinical lessons.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Jean-Pierre Danjoux
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Comparison of prophylactic higher fluence corneal cross-linking to control, in myopic LASIK, one year results.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis; Costas Karabatsas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-27

Review 3.  Epithelial ingrowth following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): prevalence, risk factors, management and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Sathish Srinivasan; Jean-Pierre Danjoux
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-29

Review 4.  Visual outcomes and management after corneal refractive surgery: A review.

Authors:  Ane Murueta-Goyena; Pilar Cañadas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-11-26

5.  Epithelial ingrowth following small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Sanjana Srivatsa; Shana Sood
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Intraoperative optical coherence tomography-guided management of post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth.

Authors:  Manpreet Kaur; Sridevi Nair; Saima A Mazumdar; Jeewan S Titiyal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Commentary: Intraoperative optical coherence tomography-guided management of post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth.

Authors:  Hariprasad V Hebri; Ramya Nayak; Roopashree Rao
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Post-Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Epithelial Ingrowth: Treatment, Recurrence, and Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Nilufer Yesilirmak; Priyanka Chhadva; Florence Cabot; Anat Galor; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.152

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.