Literature DB >> 22714391

Structure-preserving model reduction of passive and quasi-active neurons.

Kathryn R Hedrick1, Steven J Cox.   

Abstract

The spatial component of input signals often carries information crucial to a neuron's function, but models mapping synaptic inputs to the transmembrane potential can be computationally expensive. Existing reduced models of the neuron either merge compartments, thereby sacrificing the spatial specificity of inputs, or apply model reduction techniques that sacrifice the underlying electrophysiology of the model. We use Krylov subspace projection methods to construct reduced models of passive and quasi-active neurons that preserve both the spatial specificity of inputs and the electrophysiological interpretation as an RC and RLC circuit, respectively. Each reduced model accurately computes the potential at the spike initiation zone (SIZ) given a much smaller dimension and simulation time, as we show numerically and theoretically. The structure is preserved through the similarity in the circuit representations, for which we provide circuit diagrams and mathematical expressions for the circuit elements. Furthermore, the transformation from the full to the reduced system is straightforward and depends on intrinsic properties of the dendrite. As each reduced model is accurate and has a clear electrophysiological interpretation, the reduced models can be used not only to simulate morphologically accurate neurons but also to examine computations performed in dendrites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22714391     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-012-0403-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  15 in total

1.  Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity.

Authors:  W RALL
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Spatial distribution of inputs and local receptive field properties of a wide-field, looming sensitive neuron.

Authors:  Holger G Krapp; Fabrizio Gabbiani
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Morphologically accurate reduced order modeling of spiking neurons.

Authors:  Anthony R Kellems; Saifon Chaturantabut; Danny C Sorensen; Steven J Cox
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Conditional dendritic spike propagation following distal synaptic activation of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Tim Jarsky; Alex Roxin; William L Kath; Nelson Spruston
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration.

Authors:  Nelson Spruston
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  A generalized tapering equivalent cable model for dendritic neurons.

Authors:  R R Poznanski
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Reduced order modeling of passive and quasi-active dendrites for nervous system simulation.

Authors:  Boyuan Yan; Peng Li
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  Reduced compartmental models of neocortical pyramidal cells.

Authors:  P C Bush; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Low-dimensional, morphologically accurate models of subthreshold membrane potential.

Authors:  Anthony R Kellems; Derrick Roos; Nan Xiao; Steven J Cox
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. II. response decrement, convergence, and the nature of the excitatory afferents to the fan-like dendrites of the LGMD.

Authors:  M O'shea; C H Rowell
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  Model reduction of strong-weak neurons.

Authors:  Bosen Du; Danny Sorensen; Steven J Cox
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  The receptive field is dead. Long live the receptive field?

Authors:  Adrienne Fairhall
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.