Literature DB >> 22712724

Evolutionary comparison of the mechanism of DNA cleavage with respect to immune diversity and genomic instability.

Nasim A Begum1, Tasuku Honjo.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the genetic mechanism for immune diversity is unique and distinct from that for general genome diversity, in part because of the high efficiency and strict regulation of immune diversity. This expectation was partially met by the discovery of RAG1 and -2, which catalyze V(D)J recombination to generate the immune repertoire of B and T lymphocyte receptors. RAG1 and -2 were later shown to be derived from a transposon. On the other hand, activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which mediates both somatic hypermutation (SHM) and the class-switch recombination (CSR) of the immunoglobulin genes, evolved earlier than RAG1 and -2 in jawless vertebrates. This review compares immune diversity and general genome diversity from an evolutionary perspective, shedding light on the roles of DNA-cleaving enzymes and target recognition markers. This comparison revealed that AID-mediated SHM and CSR share the cleaving enzyme topoisomerase 1 with transcription-associated mutation (TAM) and triplet contraction, which is involved in many genetic diseases. These genome-altering events appear to target DNA with non-B structure, which is induced by the inefficient correction of the excessive supercoiling that is caused by active transcription. Furthermore, an epigenetic modification on chromatin (histone H3K4 trimethylation) is used as a mark for DNA cleavage sites in meiotic recombination, V(D)J recombination, CSR, and SHM. We conclude that acquired immune diversity evolved via the appearance of an AID orthologue that utilized a preexisting mechanism for genomic instability, such as TAM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22712724     DOI: 10.1021/bi3005895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  6 in total

1.  Accumulation of the FACT complex, as well as histone H3.3, serves as a target marker for somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Masatoshi Aida; Nesreen Hamad; Andre Stanlie; Nasim A Begum; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA structure matters.

Authors:  Albino Bacolla; David N Cooper; Karen M Vasquez
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.117

3.  Phf5a regulates DNA repair in class switch recombination via p400 and histone H2A variant deposition.

Authors:  Nasim A Begum; Farazul Haque; Andre Stanlie; Afzal Husain; Samiran Mondal; Mikiyo Nakata; Takako Taniguchi; Hisaaki Taniguchi; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 14.012

4.  Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase Does Not Impact Murine Meiotic Recombination.

Authors:  Catarina S Cortesao; Raquel F Freitas; Vasco M Barreto
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  FACT and H3.3: new markers for the somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  Masatoshi Aida; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Chromatin remodeller SMARCA4 recruits topoisomerase 1 and suppresses transcription-associated genomic instability.

Authors:  Afzal Husain; Nasim A Begum; Takako Taniguchi; Hisaaki Taniguchi; Maki Kobayashi; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.