BACKGROUND: Approximately 75% of hospitalized patients with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) will require intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) because of compromised respiratory function. It is difficult to predict those CSCI patients who will require prolonged ventilation and therefore will most benefit from early tracheostomy. This study intended to show the benefits of tracheostomy, particularly early, and to identify predictors of prolonged MV after CSCI. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged 16 years and older with acute CSCI admitted to London Health Science Center from 1991 to 2010 was performed. Demographic data and clinical parameters were extracted from medical records and the trauma registry. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of prolonged MV. RESULTS: There were 66 eligible patients of which 42 (62%) had a tracheostomy performed. Five patients (7.6%) remained ventilator dependent and seven (10.6%) died more than 7 days after injury secondary to sepsis. After adjusting for the number of ventilator days after injury, patients who had a tracheostomy had fewer pulmonary complications than those who did not have a tracheostomy (p = 0.001). Early tracheostomy resulted in fewer days on the ventilator and a shorter hospital stay. Clinical parameters that predicted MV to be required longer than 7 days were Injury Severity Score > 32, complete SCI, and a PAO2/FIO2 ratio < 300 3 days after MV was initiated. CONCLUSION: We recommend early tracheostomy if the Injury Severity Score is >32, the patient has a complete SCI, and the PAO2/FIO2 ratio is <300 3 days after MV was initiated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 75% of hospitalized patients with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) will require intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) because of compromised respiratory function. It is difficult to predict those CSCI patients who will require prolonged ventilation and therefore will most benefit from early tracheostomy. This study intended to show the benefits of tracheostomy, particularly early, and to identify predictors of prolonged MV after CSCI. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients aged 16 years and older with acute CSCI admitted to London Health Science Center from 1991 to 2010 was performed. Demographic data and clinical parameters were extracted from medical records and the trauma registry. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of prolonged MV. RESULTS: There were 66 eligible patients of which 42 (62%) had a tracheostomy performed. Five patients (7.6%) remained ventilator dependent and seven (10.6%) died more than 7 days after injury secondary to sepsis. After adjusting for the number of ventilator days after injury, patients who had a tracheostomy had fewer pulmonary complications than those who did not have a tracheostomy (p = 0.001). Early tracheostomy resulted in fewer days on the ventilator and a shorter hospital stay. Clinical parameters that predicted MV to be required longer than 7 days were Injury Severity Score > 32, complete SCI, and a PAO2/FIO2 ratio < 300 3 days after MV was initiated. CONCLUSION: We recommend early tracheostomy if the Injury Severity Score is >32, the patient has a complete SCI, and the PAO2/FIO2 ratio is <300 3 days after MV was initiated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.
Authors: Akram H Guirgis; Venugopal K Menon; Neelam Suri; Nilay Chatterjee; Emil Attallah; Maged Y Saad; Shereen Elshaer Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2016-11-30
Authors: Antonio Montoto-Marqués; Natalia Trillo-Dono; María Elena Ferreiro-Velasco; Sebastián Salvador-de la Barrera; Antonio Rodriguez-Sotillo; Mónica Mourelo-Fariña; Rita Galeiras-Vázquez; Rosa Meijide-Failde Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Rita Galeiras Vázquez; Pedro Rascado Sedes; Mónica Mourelo Fariña; Antonio Montoto Marqués; M Elena Ferreiro Velasco Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 3.411