Literature DB >> 22710708

The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics.

Louise Eriksson1, Kamila Czene, Lena Rosenberg, Keith Humphreys, Per Hall.   

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD) is a well-established risk factor for breast cancer. Whether MD influences the tumor phenotype remains to be clarified. Previous studies are highly inconsistent and most lack important covariate information. This is a case-only study within a population-based case-control study. Cases were all postmenopausal women, aged 50-74 years, with incident breast cancer, diagnosed 1993-1995, and with no history of previous cancer (n = 2,720). 1,747 women with mammograms and information on tumor characteristics were included in analyses. MD was assessed using a computer-assisted thresholding technique. We used linear, logistic, and multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for possible confounders, to study density and tumor characteristics. PD was only statistically significantly associated with tumor size in our study (regression coefficient 0.031, p = 0.017). The effect of PD on tumor size was greater when mode of detection was excluded from the model (regression coefficient 0.043, p = 0.001). No other associations between PD and the tumor characteristics studied (lymph node metastasis, ER-status, PR-status, grade, and histopathological classification) were observed. In summary, PD was positively associated with tumor size in postmenopausal women. However, the relationship was at least partially confounded by mode of detection. Although there may be a true biological relationship between MD and more highly proliferative tumors, it also seems that part of this relationship is due to masking delaying diagnosis. In conclusion, PD does not seem to be differentially associated with tumor phenotype, except for tumor size, after taking mode of detection into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22710708     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2127-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  18 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Radiological assessment of breast density by visual classification (BI-RADS) compared to automated volumetric digital software (Quantra): implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Elisa Regini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Gianluca Ghione; Andrea Luparia; Pier Paolo Campanino; Caterina Chiara Bianchi; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Height and Body Size in Childhood, Adolescence, and Young Adulthood and Breast Cancer Risk According to Molecular Subtype in the Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Rong Hu; Laura C Collins; Andrew H Beck; Stuart Schnitt; Bernard Rosner; A Heather Eliassen; Karin B Michels; Walter C Willett; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-09

4.  Association of mammographic density measures and breast cancer "intrinsic" molecular subtypes.

Authors:  Geffen Kleinstern; Christopher G Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Matthew R Jensen; V Shane Pankratz; Kimberly A Bertrand; Aaron D Norman; Daniel W Visscher; Fergus J Couch; Kathleen Brandt; John Shepherd; Fang-Fang Wu; Yunn-Yi Chen; Steven R Cummings; Stacey Winham; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Associations between mammographic density and tumor characteristics in Chinese women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Erni Li; Jennifer L Guida; Yuan Tian; Hyuna Sung; Hela Koka; Mengjie Li; Ariane Chan; Han Zhang; Eric Tang; Changyuan Guo; Joseph Deng; Nan Hu; Ning Lu; Gretchen L Gierach; Jing Li; Xiaohong R Yang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Enhancement of mammographic density measures in breast cancer risk prediction.

Authors:  Abbas Cheddad; Kamila Czene; John A Shepherd; Jingmei Li; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Relationship of mammographic density and gene expression: analysis of normal breast tissue surrounding breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuezheng Sun; Gretchen L Gierach; Rupninder Sandhu; Tyisha Williams; Bentley R Midkiff; Jolanta Lissowska; Ewa Wesolowska; Norman F Boyd; Nicole B Johnson; Jonine D Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Breast cancer tumour growth modelling for studying the association of body size with tumour growth rate and symptomatic detection using case-control data.

Authors:  Linda Abrahamsson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium.

Authors:  Cecilia W Huo; Grace Chew; Prue Hill; Dexing Huang; Wendy Ingman; Leigh Hodson; Kristy A Brown; Astrid Magenau; Amr H Allam; Ewan McGhee; Paul Timpson; Michael A Henderson; Erik W Thompson; Kara Britt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain.

Authors:  Laia Domingo; Dolores Salas; Raquel Zubizarreta; Marisa Baré; Garbiñe Sarriugarte; Teresa Barata; Josefa Ibáñez; Jordi Blanch; Montserrat Puig-Vives; Ana Fernández; Xavier Castells; Maria Sala
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.